Materials / Compare

Copper C110 vs. Plastic Nylon

Compare Copper C110 vs. Plastic Nylon strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Copper C110Wrought
Plastic Nylon3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength69MPasourcetypical, 0.5% extension under load63.1MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength221MPasourcetypical63.1MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)
Flexural strengthnot sourced82.9MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break55%sourcetypical, 1 in. rodnot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)117GPasourcetypical50.3x stiffer2.33GPasourcetypical
Density8,913kg/m³sourcenominal1,140kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight7.74kN·m/kg55.4kN·m/kg7.15x higher
Stiffness to weight13.1MN·m/kg6.43x higher2.04MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.34sourcereference value at room temperature (Wieland-K32 = Cu-ETP = C11000, rolled products)0.4sourcebase material: unfilled polyamide (PA), conditioned, maker design-guide family value (Covestro Table 3-1)
Shear modulus43.7GPa52.5x stiffer in shear0.833GPa
Bulk modulus122GPa3.89GPa
Speed of sound3,626m/s1,430m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity391W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C0.33W/m·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K) and PA6 (B3S), 23 C (same value for both)
Thermal expansion16.9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C98–102µm/m·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K, 98) and PA6 (B3S, 102), 23-55 C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing84.5µm growth5.92x less500µm growth
Specific heat385J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C1,700J/kg·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K) and PA6 (B3S), 23 C (same value for both)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)114mm²/s669x faster0.17mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance8,992W/m168x more resistant53.6W/m
Melting point1,065–1,083°Csourcesolidus-liquidus188°Csourcetypical
Glass transitionnot sourced55.1°Csourcetypical
Max service temperaturenot sourced89.2°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
Values forC11000 ETP copper, annealed to 0.050 mm grain size (OS050), 1 in. rod, copper.org typical valuesUltimaker Nylon, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat), conditioned >=24 h at room temperature; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v2.00, April 20, 2022.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic Nylon is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Copper C110 stronger than Plastic Nylon?

Copper C110 is stronger: its yield strength is 69 MPa against 63.1 MPa for Plastic Nylon (9%).

Which is lighter, Copper C110 or Plastic Nylon?

Plastic Nylon is lighter: 1,140 kg/m³ against 8,913 kg/m³ for Copper C110.

Which is stiffer, Copper C110 or Plastic Nylon?

Copper C110 is stiffer: Young's modulus 117 GPa against 2.33 GPa for Plastic Nylon, so the same part in Copper C110 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Copper C110 or Plastic Nylon?

For the same stiffness or strength: Copper C110 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension); Plastic Nylon is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beCopper C110Plastic Nylon
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter6.43x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)10% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate2.12x heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie7.15x heavierlighter
Strong beam7.37x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate7.48x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Copper C110 or Plastic Nylon?

Copper C110 conducts heat better: 391 W/m·K against 0.33 W/m·K for Plastic Nylon.

Which expands less with temperature?

Copper C110 expands less: 16.9 µm/m·K against 100 µm/m·K for Plastic Nylon.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelCopper C110Plastic Nylon
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPURubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickCopper C110Plastic Nylon
Strength against density

Related comparisons