Materials / Compare

Copper C110 vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)

Compare Copper C110 vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Copper C110Wrought
Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Bulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength69MPasourcetypical, 0.5% extension under load45MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield 23 °C
Ultimate tensile strength221MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Flexural strengthnot sourced65MPasourcetypical, 23 °C
Elongation at break55%sourcetypical, 1 in. rod10%sourcenominal strain at break, 23 °C
Young's modulus (stiffness)117GPasourcetypical51x stiffer2.3GPasourcetypical
Density8,913kg/m³sourcenominal1,040kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight7.74kN·m/kg43.3kN·m/kg5.59x higher
Stiffness to weight13.1MN·m/kg5.95x higher2.21MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.34sourcereference value at room temperature (Wieland-K32 = Cu-ETP = C11000, rolled products)0.39sourcetypical, ABS family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1)
Shear modulus43.7GPa52.9x stiffer in shear0.827GPa
Bulk modulus122GPa3.48GPa
Speed of sound3,626m/s1,487m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity391W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C0.17W/m·Ksourcetypical
Thermal expansion16.9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C80–110µm/m·Ksourcerange
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing84.5µm growth5.62x less475µm growth
Specific heat385J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °Cnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)114mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistance8,992W/m421x more resistant21.4W/m
Melting point1,065–1,083°Csourcesolidus-liquidusnot sourced
Max service temperaturenot sourced94°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa (annealed 4 h/80 °C)
Values forC11000 ETP copper, annealed to 0.050 mm grain size (OS050), 1 in. rod, copper.org typical valuesINEOS Styrolution Terluran GP-22 general-purpose injection-molding ABS, ISO typical values (TDS revision 08/01/2022)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Copper C110 stronger than Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)?

Copper C110 is stronger: its yield strength is 69 MPa against 45 MPa for Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) (1.53x).

Which is lighter, Copper C110 or Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)?

Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) is lighter: 1,040 kg/m³ against 8,913 kg/m³ for Copper C110.

Which is stiffer, Copper C110 or Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)?

Copper C110 is stiffer: Young's modulus 117 GPa against 2.3 GPa for Plastic ABS (bulk/injection), so the same part in Copper C110 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Copper C110 or Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)?

For the same stiffness or strength: Copper C110 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension); Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beCopper C110Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter5.95x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)20% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate2.31x heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie5.59x heavierlighter
Strong beam6.45x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate6.92x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Copper C110 or Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)?

Copper C110 conducts heat better: 391 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for Plastic ABS (bulk/injection).

Which expands less with temperature?

Copper C110 expands less: 16.9 µm/m·K against 95 µm/m·K for Plastic ABS (bulk/injection).

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelCopper C110Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickCopper C110Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
Strength against density

Related comparisons