Thermal conductivity against densityHigher and further left: spreads more heat for its weightThermal expansion against thermal conductivityLower and further right: warps less when heated
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser
Sources3 documents: Copper Development Association, Bambu Lab, Wieland
Copper C12200
C12200 phosphorus-deoxidized copper (DHP, the air-conditioning and refrigeration tube copper), tube annealed to 0.050 mm grain size (OS050), 0.065 in. wall, copper.org typical values
FDM PAHT-CF
Bambu Lab PAHT-CF, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y, dry state; nozzle 290 °C, bed 100 °C, 100 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.
1
C12200 Alloy (copper.org)Copper Development Associationarchived copyCopper C12200 · Yield strength: typical, 0.5% extension under load, 0.065 in. tubeCopper C12200 · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, 0.065 in. tubeCopper C12200 · Elongation at break: typical, 0.065 in. tubeCopper C12200 · Young's modulus (stiffness): typicalCopper C12200 · Density: nominalCopper C12200 · Thermal conductivity: typical, 20 °CCopper C12200 · Thermal expansion: typical, mean 20-100 °CCopper C12200 · Specific heat: typical, 20 °CCopper C12200 · Melting point: liquidus
Wieland-K19 (Cu-DHP, C12200) Data SheetWielandarchived copyCopper C12200 · Poisson's ratio: reference value at room temperature (Wieland-K19 = Cu-DHP = C12200, rolled products)
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
FDM PAHT-CF is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Mechanical
Is Copper C12200 stronger than FDM PAHT-CF?
FDM PAHT-CF is stronger: its tensile strength is 92 MPa against yield strength 69 MPa for Copper C12200 (33%).
Which is lighter, Copper C12200 or FDM PAHT-CF?
FDM PAHT-CF is lighter: 1,060 kg/m³ against 8,941 kg/m³ for Copper C12200.
Which is stiffer, Copper C12200 or FDM PAHT-CF?
Copper C12200 is stiffer: Young's modulus 117 GPa against 3.86 GPa for FDM PAHT-CF, so the same part in Copper C12200 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Copper C12200 or FDM PAHT-CF?
For the same stiffness or strength: Copper C12200 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension); FDM PAHT-CF is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
Part that must be
Copper C12200
FDM PAHT-CF
Stiff rod or tie (tension)
lighter
3.6x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)
1.53x heavier
lighter
Stiff panel or plate
2.7x heavier
lighter
Strong rod or tie
11.2x heavier
lighter
Strong beam
10.2x heavier
lighter
Strong panel or plate
9.74x heavier
lighter
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, Copper C12200 or FDM PAHT-CF?
Copper C12200 stretches further before it breaks: 45% elongation at break against 8.4% for FDM PAHT-CF.