Materials / Compare
Nickel Inconel 718 vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
Compare Nickel Inconel 718 vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset | 40.4MPasourcetypical |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | 40.4MPasourcetypical |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 67MPasourcetypical |
| Elongation at break | 20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | 79%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 1.8GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged | 1,090kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 147kN·m/kg3.96x higher | 37.1kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 24.3MN·m/kg14.7x higher | 1.65MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | not sourced |
| Shear modulus | 77.3GPa | not sourced |
| Bulk modulus | 162GPa | not sourced |
| Speed of sound | 4,932m/s | 1,285m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a) | not sourced |
| Thermal expansion | 13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged | 134µm/m·Ksourcemean 0-150 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 66µm growth10.2x less | 671µm growth |
| Specific heat | 435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 3.19mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 3,680W/m | not sourced |
| Melting point | 1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting range | not sourced |
| Glass transition | not sourced | 112°CsourceDMA |
| Max service temperature | 704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer | 57°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa |
| Values for | INCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical values | Formlabs Tough 2000 Resin V2 (FLTO2002), TDS Rev. 01 10/06/2025; printed on Form 4 at 100 µm, washed in Form Wash V2 10+5 min in >=99% IPA, post-cured 70 °C for 12 min in Form Cure V2. Orientation not stated. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
SLA Resin Tough 2000 is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is Nickel Inconel 718 stronger than SLA Resin Tough 2000?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 40.4 MPa for SLA Resin Tough 2000 (29.9x).
Which is lighter, Nickel Inconel 718 or SLA Resin Tough 2000?
SLA Resin Tough 2000 is lighter: 1,090 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which is stiffer, Nickel Inconel 718 or SLA Resin Tough 2000?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 1.8 GPa for SLA Resin Tough 2000, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Nickel Inconel 718 or SLA Resin Tough 2000?
For the same stiffness or strength: Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam; SLA Resin Tough 2000 is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Nickel Inconel 718 | SLA Resin Tough 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 14.7x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 40% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | 1.57x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 3.96x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 28% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | 38% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which expands less with temperature?
Nickel Inconel 718 expands less: 13.2 µm/m·K against 134 µm/m·K for SLA Resin Tough 2000.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 1045
- SLA Resin Tough 2000 vs. Plastic ABS
- SLA Resin Tough 2000 vs. Plastic PETG
- SLA Resin Tough 2000 vs. SLS PA12 Nylon
- SLA Resin Tough 2000 vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)