Materials / Compare

Magnesium AZ91D vs. Titanium

Compare Magnesium AZ91D vs. Titanium strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Magnesium AZ91DCast
TitaniumWrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength150MPasourcetypical, 0.2% tensile yield, ambient temperature885MPasourcetypical, plate (>0.187 in), annealed, 0.2% offset
Ultimate tensile strength230MPasourcetypical, ambient temperature940MPasourcetypical, plate, annealed
Elongation at break3%sourcetypical, ambient temperature16%sourcetypical, in 2 in., plate annealed
Young's modulus (stiffness)45GPasourcetypical107–122GPasourcetypical range, 20 °C
Density1,810kg/m³sourcetypical4,430kg/m³sourcenominal
Strength to weight82.9kN·m/kg200kN·m/kg2.41x higher
Stiffness to weight24.9MN·m/kg25.8MN·m/kg4% higher
Poisson's ratio0.35sourcebase material: AZ91C casting (MIL-HDBK-5J handbook physical constant)0.342sourcemean of TIMET measurements
Shear modulus16.7GPa42.7GPa2.56x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus50GPa121GPa
Speed of sound4,986m/s5,084m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity72W/m·Ksourcetypical6.6W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C, mill annealed
Thermal expansion25µm/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature range not stated9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 0-100 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing125µm growth45µm growth2.78x less
Specific heat1,050J/kg·Ksourcetypical580J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)37.9mm²/s14.7x faster2.57mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance6,240W/m1.67x more resistant3,730W/m
Melting point470–595°Csourcemelting range1,630–1,650°Csourcemelting range
Max service temperaturenot sourced400°Csourceupper recommended use temperature
Values forELEKTRON AZ91D magnesium die-casting alloy, as cast; Magnesium Elektron datasheet 475 (7/01), typical properties; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5J for AZ91C castings.TIMETAL 6-4 (Ti-6Al-4V Grade 5) annealed plate typical (TIMET properties manual) + TIMET datasheet TMC-0150 physical properties

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Magnesium AZ91D stronger than Titanium?

Titanium is stronger: its yield strength is 885 MPa against 150 MPa for Magnesium AZ91D (5.9x).

Which is lighter, Magnesium AZ91D or Titanium?

Magnesium AZ91D is lighter: 1,810 kg/m³ against 4,430 kg/m³ for Titanium.

Which is stiffer, Magnesium AZ91D or Titanium?

Titanium is stiffer: Young's modulus 115 GPa against 45 GPa for Magnesium AZ91D, so the same part in Titanium deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Magnesium AZ91D or Titanium?

For the same stiffness or strength: Magnesium AZ91D is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate; Titanium is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), strong rod or tie, strong beam.

Part that must beMagnesium AZ91DTitanium
Stiff rod or tie (tension)4% heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)lighter1.53x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter1.79x heavier
Strong rod or tie2.41x heavierlighter
Strong beam33% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plateabout equalabout equal

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Magnesium AZ91D or Titanium?

Magnesium AZ91D conducts heat better: 72 W/m·K against 6.6 W/m·K for Titanium.

Which expands less with temperature?

Titanium expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 25 µm/m·K for Magnesium AZ91D.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Solder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Magnesium AZ91DTitanium
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Solder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Magnesium AZ91DTitanium
Strength against density

Related comparisons