Materials / Compare

FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PEEK

Compare FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PEEK strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM Polycarbonate3D printed (FDM)
Plastic PEEKBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength53.3MPasourcetypical98MPasourcetypical, tensile yield
Ultimate tensile strength53.3MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)not sourced
Compressive strengthnot sourced125MPasourcetypical, 23 C
Flexural strength89.4MPasourcetypical165MPasourcetypical, flexural stress at yield, 23 C
Elongation at break9.2%sourcetypical25%sourcetypical, at break
Young's modulus (stiffness)2.39GPasourcetypical4GPasourcetypical (nominal)
Density1,180–1,200kg/m³sourcerange1,300kg/m³sourcetypical (crystalline)
Strength to weight44.8kN·m/kg75.4kN·m/kg1.68x higher
Stiffness to weight2.01MN·m/kg3.08MN·m/kg1.53x higher
Poisson's ratio0.38sourcebase material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1)0.38sourcetypical
Shear modulus0.867GPa1.45GPa1.67x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus3.33GPa5.56GPa
Speed of sound1,418m/s1,754m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °C0.29W/m·Ksourcetypical, average, 23 C
Thermal expansion65µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel55µm/m·Ksourceaverage of flow/cross-flow, below Tg (<143 C)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing325µm growth275µm growth18% less
Specific heatnot sourced2,200J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 23 °C, DSC (Victrex PEEK 450G TDS, revision Jul 2012)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced0.101mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance42.5W/m80.1W/m1.89x more resistant
Melting pointnot sourced343°Csourcetypical, DSC
Glass transition108°Csourcetypical143°Csourceonset (midpoint 150 C)
Max service temperature105°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)240°CsourceUL 746B RTI, mechanical strength (continuous use index)
Values forUltimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022.Victrex PEEK 450G (unreinforced, injection moulded), Victrex TDS rev. March 2026; Poisson from Victrex fluid-management flyer (2020-07)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM Polycarbonate is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM Polycarbonate stronger than Plastic PEEK?

Plastic PEEK is stronger: its yield strength is 98 MPa against 53.3 MPa for FDM Polycarbonate (1.84x).

Which is lighter, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PEEK?

FDM Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,190 kg/m³ against 1,300 kg/m³ for Plastic PEEK.

Which is stiffer, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PEEK?

Plastic PEEK is stiffer: Young's modulus 4 GPa against 2.39 GPa for FDM Polycarbonate, so the same part in Plastic PEEK deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PEEK?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PEEK is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beFDM PolycarbonatePlastic PEEK
Stiff rod or tie (tension)1.53x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)18% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate9% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie1.68x heavierlighter
Strong beam37% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate24% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PEEK?

Plastic PEEK conducts heat better: 0.29 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.

Which expands less with temperature?

Plastic PEEK expands less: 55 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM PolycarbonatePlastic PEEK
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM PolycarbonatePlastic PEEK
Strength against density

Related comparisons