Materials / Compare

FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PMMA

Compare FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PMMA strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM Polycarbonate3D printed (FDM)
Plastic PMMABulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength53.3MPasourcetypicalnot given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength53.3MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)80MPasourcetypical, 23 °C
Compressive strengthnot sourced110MPasourcecompressive yield stress, typical
Flexural strength89.4MPasourcetypical115MPasourcetypical29% stronger in bending
Elongation at break9.2%sourcetypical1.67x more ductile5.5%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)2.39GPasourcetypical3.3GPasourcetypical, short-term
Density1,180–1,200kg/m³sourcerange1,190kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight44.8kN·m/kg67.2kN·m/kg1.5x higher
Stiffness to weight2.01MN·m/kg2.77MN·m/kg38% higher
Poisson's ratio0.38sourcebase material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1)0.37sourcetypical
Shear modulus0.867GPa1.2GPa39% stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus3.33GPa4.23GPa
Speed of sound1,418m/s1,665m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °C0.19W/m·Ksourcetypical
Thermal expansion65µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel70µm/m·Ksource0-50 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing325µm growth8% less350µm growth
Specific heatnot sourced1,470J/kg·Ksourcetypical
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced0.109mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance42.5W/m2% more resistant41.5W/m
Glass transition108°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Max service temperature105°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)80°Csourcemax. permanent service temperature
Values forUltimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022.Röhm PLEXIGLAS GS 0F00 cast acrylic sheet, typical values at 23 °C / 50 % RH (Röhm Technical Information Ref. No. 211-1)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM Polycarbonate is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM Polycarbonate stronger than Plastic PMMA?

Plastic PMMA is stronger: its tensile strength is 80 MPa against yield strength 53.3 MPa for FDM Polycarbonate (1.5x).

Which is lighter, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PMMA?

FDM Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,190 kg/m³ against 1,190 kg/m³ for Plastic PMMA.

Which is stiffer, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PMMA?

Plastic PMMA is stiffer: Young's modulus 3.3 GPa against 2.39 GPa for FDM Polycarbonate, so the same part in Plastic PMMA deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PMMA?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PMMA is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beFDM PolycarbonatePlastic PMMA
Stiff rod or tie (tension)38% heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)17% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate11% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie1.5x heavierlighter
Strong beam31% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate23% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which is more ductile, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PMMA?

FDM Polycarbonate stretches further before it breaks: 9.2% elongation at break against 5.5% for Plastic PMMA.

Which conducts heat better, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PMMA?

FDM Polycarbonate conducts heat better: 0.2 W/m·K against 0.19 W/m·K for Plastic PMMA.

Which expands less with temperature?

FDM Polycarbonate expands less: 65 µm/m·K against 70 µm/m·K for Plastic PMMA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropyleneFDM ASAFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM PolycarbonatePlastic PMMA
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropyleneFDM ASAFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM PolycarbonatePlastic PMMA
Strength against density

Related comparisons