Materials / Compare
FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PMMA
Compare FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PMMA strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 53.3MPasourcetypical | not given (tensile used) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 53.3MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) | 80MPasourcetypical, 23 °C |
| Compressive strength | not sourced | 110MPasourcecompressive yield stress, typical |
| Flexural strength | 89.4MPasourcetypical | 115MPasourcetypical29% stronger in bending |
| Elongation at break | 9.2%sourcetypical1.67x more ductile | 5.5%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.39GPasourcetypical | 3.3GPasourcetypical, short-term |
| Density | 1,180–1,200kg/m³sourcerange | 1,190kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 44.8kN·m/kg | 67.2kN·m/kg1.5x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 2.01MN·m/kg | 2.77MN·m/kg38% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.38sourcebase material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) | 0.37sourcetypical |
| Shear modulus | 0.867GPa | 1.2GPa39% stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 3.33GPa | 4.23GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,418m/s | 1,665m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °C | 0.19W/m·Ksourcetypical |
| Thermal expansion | 65µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel | 70µm/m·Ksource0-50 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 325µm growth8% less | 350µm growth |
| Specific heat | not sourced | 1,470J/kg·Ksourcetypical |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | 0.109mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 42.5W/m2% more resistant | 41.5W/m |
| Glass transition | 108°Csourcetypical | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 105°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) | 80°Csourcemax. permanent service temperature |
| Values for | Ultimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022. | Röhm PLEXIGLAS GS 0F00 cast acrylic sheet, typical values at 23 °C / 50 % RH (Röhm Technical Information Ref. No. 211-1) |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
FDM Polycarbonate is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is FDM Polycarbonate stronger than Plastic PMMA?
Plastic PMMA is stronger: its tensile strength is 80 MPa against yield strength 53.3 MPa for FDM Polycarbonate (1.5x).
Which is lighter, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PMMA?
FDM Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,190 kg/m³ against 1,190 kg/m³ for Plastic PMMA.
Which is stiffer, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PMMA?
Plastic PMMA is stiffer: Young's modulus 3.3 GPa against 2.39 GPa for FDM Polycarbonate, so the same part in Plastic PMMA deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PMMA?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PMMA is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | FDM Polycarbonate | Plastic PMMA |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 38% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 17% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 11% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 1.5x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 31% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 23% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PMMA?
FDM Polycarbonate stretches further before it breaks: 9.2% elongation at break against 5.5% for Plastic PMMA.
Which conducts heat better, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PMMA?
FDM Polycarbonate conducts heat better: 0.2 W/m·K against 0.19 W/m·K for Plastic PMMA.
Which expands less with temperature?
FDM Polycarbonate expands less: 65 µm/m·K against 70 µm/m·K for Plastic PMMA.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic PMMA vs. Plastic Nylon PA66
- Plastic PMMA vs. Plastic Nylon PA6
- Plastic PMMA vs. FDM PAHT-CF
- Plastic PMMA vs. Plastic POM/Acetal