Materials / Compare

Plastic PEEK vs. Plastic Polypropylene

Compare Plastic PEEK vs. Plastic Polypropylene strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic PEEKBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Plastic PolypropyleneBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength98MPasourcetypical, tensile yield33MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527
Ultimate tensile strengthnot sourcednot sourced
Compressive strength125MPasourcetypical, 23 Cnot sourced
Flexural strength165MPasourcetypical, flexural stress at yield, 23 Cnot sourced
Elongation at break25%sourcetypical, at breaknot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)4GPasourcetypical (nominal)1.45GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527
Density1,300kg/m³sourcetypical (crystalline)900kg/m³sourcetypical, 23 °C ISO 1183-1
Strength to weight75.4kN·m/kg2.06x higher36.7kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight3.08MN·m/kg1.91x higher1.61MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.38sourcetypical0.42sourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
Shear modulus1.45GPa2.84x stiffer in shear0.511GPa
Bulk modulus5.56GPa3.02GPa
Speed of sound1,754m/s1,269m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.29W/m·Ksourcetypical, average, 23 C0.17–0.22W/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
Thermal expansion55µm/m·Ksourceaverage of flow/cross-flow, below Tg (<143 C)80–100µm/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing275µm growth1.64x less450µm growth
Specific heat2,200J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 23 °C, DSC (Victrex PEEK 450G TDS, revision Jul 2012)not sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.101mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistance80.1W/m2.8x more resistant28.6W/m
Melting point343°Csourcetypical, DSCnot sourced
Glass transition143°Csourceonset (midpoint 150 C)not sourced
Max service temperature240°CsourceUL 746B RTI, mechanical strength (continuous use index)90°CsourceHDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealed
Values forVictrex PEEK 450G (unreinforced, injection moulded), Victrex TDS rev. March 2026; Poisson from Victrex fluid-management flyer (2020-07)LyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO values

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Plastic PEEK stronger than Plastic Polypropylene?

Plastic PEEK is stronger: its yield strength is 98 MPa against 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (2.97x).

Which is lighter, Plastic PEEK or Plastic Polypropylene?

Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 1,300 kg/m³ for Plastic PEEK.

Which is stiffer, Plastic PEEK or Plastic Polypropylene?

Plastic PEEK is stiffer: Young's modulus 4 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in Plastic PEEK deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PEEK or Plastic Polypropylene?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PEEK is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Plastic Polypropylene is lighter for a stiff panel or plate.

Part that must bePlastic PEEKPlastic Polypropylene
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter1.91x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter15% heavier
Stiff panel or plate3% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tielighter2.06x heavier
Strong beamlighter43% heavier
Strong panel or platelighter19% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic PEEK or Plastic Polypropylene?

Plastic PEEK conducts heat better: 0.29 W/m·K against 0.195 W/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.

Which expands less with temperature?

Plastic PEEK expands less: 55 µm/m·K against 90 µm/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PEEKPlastic Polypropylene
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic PEEKPlastic Polypropylene
Strength against density

Related comparisons