Materials / Compare
Plastic PETG vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
Compare Plastic PETG vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 46.2MPasourcetypical | 885MPasourcetypical, plate (>0.187 in), annealed, 0.2% offset |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 46.2MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) | 940MPasourcetypical, plate, annealed |
| Flexural strength | 78.9MPasourcetypical | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 7.6%sourcetypical | 16%sourcetypical, in 2 in., plate annealed |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 1.94GPasourcetypical | 107–122GPasourcetypical range, 20 °C |
| Density | 1,270kg/m³sourcetypical | 4,430kg/m³sourcenominal |
| Strength to weight | 36.4kN·m/kg | 200kN·m/kg5.49x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 1.53MN·m/kg | 25.8MN·m/kg16.9x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | not sourced | 0.342sourcemean of TIMET measurements |
| Shear modulus | not sourced | 42.7GPa |
| Bulk modulus | not sourced | 121GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,236m/s | 5,084m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.21W/m·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typical | 6.6W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C, mill annealed |
| Thermal expansion | 51µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typical | 9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 0-100 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 255µm growth | 45µm growth5.67x less |
| Specific heat | 1,300J/kg·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), DSC at 60 °C (lowest temperature listed) | 580J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 0.127mm²/s | 2.57mm²/s20.2x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | not sourced | 3,730W/m |
| Melting point | not sourced | 1,630–1,650°Csourcemelting range |
| Glass transition | 77.4°Csourcetypical | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 76.2°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) | 400°Csourceupper recommended use temperature |
| Values for | Ultimaker PETG, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v1.00, April 29, 2022. | TIMETAL 6-4 (Ti-6Al-4V Grade 5) annealed plate typical (TIMET properties manual) + TIMET datasheet TMC-0150 physical properties |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Plastic PETG is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is Plastic PETG stronger than Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is stronger: its yield strength is 885 MPa against 46.2 MPa for Plastic PETG (19.2x).
Which is lighter, Plastic PETG or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Plastic PETG is lighter: 1,270 kg/m³ against 4,430 kg/m³ for Titanium Ti-6Al-4V.
Which is stiffer, Plastic PETG or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is stiffer: Young's modulus 115 GPa against 1.94 GPa for Plastic PETG, so the same part in Titanium Ti-6Al-4V deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PETG or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
For the same stiffness or strength: Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Plastic PETG | Titanium Ti-6Al-4V |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 16.9x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 2.2x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 12% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 5.49x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 2.05x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 25% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic PETG or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V conducts heat better: 6.6 W/m·K against 0.21 W/m·K for Plastic PETG.
Which expands less with temperature?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 51 µm/m·K for Plastic PETG.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic PETG vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- Plastic PETG vs. Plastic ABS
- Plastic PETG vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic PETG vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. Titanium
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. Steel AISI 4340