Materials / Compare

Plastic PLA vs. Titanium

Compare Plastic PLA vs. Titanium strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic PLA3D printed (FDM)
TitaniumWrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength52.5MPasourcetypical885MPasourcetypical, plate (>0.187 in), annealed, 0.2% offset
Ultimate tensile strength52.5MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)940MPasourcetypical, plate, annealed
Flexural strength96.8MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break7.8%sourcetypical16%sourcetypical, in 2 in., plate annealed
Young's modulus (stiffness)3.25GPasourcetypical107–122GPasourcetypical range, 20 °C
Density1,240kg/m³sourcetypical4,430kg/m³sourcenominal
Strength to weight42.3kN·m/kg200kN·m/kg4.72x higher
Stiffness to weight2.62MN·m/kg25.8MN·m/kg9.86x higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.342sourcemean of TIMET measurements
Shear modulusnot sourced42.7GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced121GPa
Speed of sound1,619m/s5,084m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.13W/m·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C6.6W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C, mill annealed
Thermal expansionnot sourced9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 0-100 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swingnot sourced45µm growth
Specific heat1,200J/kg·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C580J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.0874mm²/s2.57mm²/s29.4x faster
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced3,730W/m
Melting point152°Csourcetypical1,630–1,650°Csourcemelting range
Glass transition59.1°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Max service temperature58.8°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)400°Csourceupper recommended use temperature
Values forUltimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022.TIMETAL 6-4 (Ti-6Al-4V Grade 5) annealed plate typical (TIMET properties manual) + TIMET datasheet TMC-0150 physical properties

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic PLA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Plastic PLA stronger than Titanium?

Titanium is stronger: its yield strength is 885 MPa against 52.5 MPa for Plastic PLA (16.9x).

Which is lighter, Plastic PLA or Titanium?

Plastic PLA is lighter: 1,240 kg/m³ against 4,430 kg/m³ for Titanium.

Which is stiffer, Plastic PLA or Titanium?

Titanium is stiffer: Young's modulus 115 GPa against 3.25 GPa for Plastic PLA, so the same part in Titanium deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PLA or Titanium?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PLA is lighter for a stiff panel or plate; Titanium is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must bePlastic PLATitanium
Stiff rod or tie (tension)9.86x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)1.66x heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter9% heavier
Strong rod or tie4.72x heavierlighter
Strong beam1.84x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate15% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic PLA or Titanium?

Titanium conducts heat better: 6.6 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PLATitanium
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic PLATitanium
Strength against density

Related comparisons