Materials / Compare

Plastic UHMWPE vs. Stainless Steel 303

Compare Plastic UHMWPE vs. Stainless Steel 303 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic UHMWPEBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Stainless Steel 303Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength20MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527, 50 mm/min275MPasourceOutokumpu typical (product P = hot rolled plate, transverse)
Ultimate tensile strength43MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at break ISO 527, 50 mm/min585MPasourceOutokumpu typical
Elongation at break465%sourcetypical, nominal elongation at break ISO 52735%sourceOutokumpu typical, A5
Young's modulus (stiffness)0.66GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527, 1 mm/min200GPasourceat RT (Table 12)
Density930kg/m³sourcetypical7,900kg/m³sourceat RT
Strength to weight21.5kN·m/kg34.8kN·m/kg1.62x higher
Stiffness to weight0.71MN·m/kg25.3MN·m/kg35.7x higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.3sourcedesign value (structural stainless steels)
Shear modulusnot sourced76.9GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced167GPa
Speed of sound842m/s5,032m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, unfilled (narrative value, generic Celanese UHMWPE)15W/m·Ksourceat RT
Thermal expansion200µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 to 100 °C (generic Celanese UHMWPE)16µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20–100 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing1,000µm growth80µm growth12.5x less
Specific heatnot sourced500J/kg·Ksourceat RT
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced3.8mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced902W/m
Melting point130–138°CsourceDSC 10 K/minnot sourced
Max service temperature80°Csourcerecommended max constant operating temperature871°Csourcecontinuous, scaling limit
Values forCelanese GUR 4120 (avg. molecular weight 4.7x10^6 g/mol), typical values on compression-molded specimens; CTE and thermal conductivity from Celanese's generic UHMWPE guide (grade not named)1.4305 / UNS S30300, Outokumpu typical values (hot rolled, solution annealed) from 'Steel Grades, Properties and Global Standards'; max service from Carpenter CarTech 303 datasheet

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Plastic UHMWPE stronger than Stainless Steel 303?

Stainless Steel 303 is stronger: its yield strength is 275 MPa against 20 MPa for Plastic UHMWPE (13.8x).

Which is lighter, Plastic UHMWPE or Stainless Steel 303?

Plastic UHMWPE is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for Stainless Steel 303.

Which is stiffer, Plastic UHMWPE or Stainless Steel 303?

Stainless Steel 303 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 0.66 GPa for Plastic UHMWPE, so the same part in Stainless Steel 303 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic UHMWPE or Stainless Steel 303?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic UHMWPE is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Stainless Steel 303 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie.

Part that must bePlastic UHMWPEStainless Steel 303
Stiff rod or tie (tension)35.7x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)2.05x heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter26% heavier
Strong rod or tie1.62x heavierlighter
Strong beamlighter48% heavier
Strong panel or platelighter2.29x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic UHMWPE or Stainless Steel 303?

Stainless Steel 303 conducts heat better: 15 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Which expands less with temperature?

Stainless Steel 303 expands less: 16 µm/m·K against 200 µm/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic UHMWPEStainless Steel 303
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic UHMWPEStainless Steel 303
Strength against density

Related comparisons