Materials / Compare

Plastic UHMWPE vs. Steel AISI 4340

Compare Plastic UHMWPE vs. Steel AISI 4340 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic UHMWPEBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Steel AISI 4340Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength20MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527, 50 mm/min1,035MPasourcetypical, transverse
Ultimate tensile strength43MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at break ISO 527, 50 mm/min1,140MPasourcetypical, transverse
Elongation at break465%sourcetypical, nominal elongation at break ISO 52718%sourcetypical, transverse
Young's modulus (stiffness)0.66GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527, 1 mm/min200GPasourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered)
Density930kg/m³sourcetypical8.43x lighter7,840kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight21.5kN·m/kg132kN·m/kg6.14x higher
Stiffness to weight0.71MN·m/kg25.5MN·m/kg35.9x higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.32sourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered)
Shear modulusnot sourced75.7GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced185GPa
Speed of sound842m/s5,049m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, unfilled (narrative value, generic Celanese UHMWPE)37.5W/m·Ksourcetypical
Thermal expansion200µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 to 100 °C (generic Celanese UHMWPE)11.3µm/m·Ksourcemean, -18 to 93 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing1,000µm growth56.5µm growth17.7x less
Specific heatnot sourced448J/kg·Ksourcetypical
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced10.7mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced11,678W/m
Melting point130–138°CsourceDSC 10 K/minnot sourced
Max service temperature80°Csourcerecommended max constant operating temperaturenot sourced
Values forCelanese GUR 4120 (avg. molecular weight 4.7x10^6 g/mol), typical values on compression-molded specimens; CTE and thermal conductivity from Celanese's generic UHMWPE guide (grade not named)Carpenter (Latrobe) Lescalloy 4340 VAC-ARC datasheet; mechanical row for 1100 °F temper; physical properties grade-level

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Plastic UHMWPE stronger than Steel AISI 4340?

Steel AISI 4340 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,035 MPa against 20 MPa for Plastic UHMWPE (51.8x).

Which is lighter, Plastic UHMWPE or Steel AISI 4340?

Plastic UHMWPE is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 7,840 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 4340.

Which is stiffer, Plastic UHMWPE or Steel AISI 4340?

Steel AISI 4340 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 0.66 GPa for Plastic UHMWPE, so the same part in Steel AISI 4340 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic UHMWPE or Steel AISI 4340?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic UHMWPE is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate; Steel AISI 4340 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam.

Part that must bePlastic UHMWPESteel AISI 4340
Stiff rod or tie (tension)35.9x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)2.06x heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter26% heavier
Strong rod or tie6.14x heavierlighter
Strong beam1.65x heavierlighter
Strong panel or platelighter17% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic UHMWPE or Steel AISI 4340?

Steel AISI 4340 conducts heat better: 37.5 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Which expands less with temperature?

Steel AISI 4340 expands less: 11.3 µm/m·K against 200 µm/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic UHMWPESteel AISI 4340
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic UHMWPESteel AISI 4340
Strength against density

Related comparisons