Materials / Compare

Plastic PMMA vs. Steel AISI 1018

Compare Plastic PMMA vs. Steel AISI 1018 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic PMMABulk polymer (molded or machined)
Steel AISI 1018Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)372MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Ultimate tensile strength80MPasourcetypical, 23 °C441MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Compressive strength110MPasourcecompressive yield stress, typicalnot sourced
Flexural strength115MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break5.5%sourcetypical15%sourcein 2 in (50.8 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)3.3GPasourcetypical, short-term200GPasourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Density1,190kg/m³sourcetypical7,861kg/m³sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Strength to weight67.2kN·m/kg42% higher47.3kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight2.77MN·m/kg25.4MN·m/kg9.17x higher
Poisson's ratio0.37sourcetypical0.32sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Shear modulus1.2GPa75.7GPa62.9x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus4.23GPa185GPa
Speed of sound1,665m/s5,043m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.19W/m·Ksourcetypical51.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Thermal expansion70µm/m·Ksource0-50 °C12µm/m·Ksourcebase material: unalloyed carbon steel, Ovako family table (S275JR, 'none alloyed structural steels', C <= 0.21%); mean 20-300 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing350µm growth60µm growth5.83x less
Specific heat1,470J/kg·Ksourcetypical486J/kg·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.109mm²/s13.6mm²/s125x faster
Thermal shock resistance41.5W/m5,473W/m132x more resistant
Max service temperature80°Csourcemax. permanent service temperaturenot sourced
Values forRöhm PLEXIGLAS GS 0F00 cast acrylic sheet, typical values at 23 °C / 50 % RH (Röhm Technical Information Ref. No. 211-1)AISI 1018 cold drawn bar (Niagara LaSalle, cold-finished bar producer)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Plastic PMMA stronger than Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is stronger: its yield strength is 372 MPa against tensile strength 80 MPa for Plastic PMMA (4.65x).

Which is lighter, Plastic PMMA or Steel AISI 1018?

Plastic PMMA is lighter: 1,190 kg/m³ against 7,861 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 1018.

Which is stiffer, Plastic PMMA or Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 3.3 GPa for Plastic PMMA, so the same part in Steel AISI 1018 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PMMA or Steel AISI 1018?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PMMA is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Steel AISI 1018 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending).

Part that must bePlastic PMMASteel AISI 1018
Stiff rod or tie (tension)9.17x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)18% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter1.68x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter42% heavier
Strong beamlighter2.37x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter3.06x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic PMMA or Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 conducts heat better: 51.9 W/m·K against 0.19 W/m·K for Plastic PMMA.

Which expands less with temperature?

Steel AISI 1018 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 70 µm/m·K for Plastic PMMA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumStainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropyleneFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PMMASteel AISI 1018
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumStainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropyleneFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic PMMASteel AISI 1018
Strength against density

Related comparisons