Materials / Compare
Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Steel AISI 4340
Compare Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Steel AISI 4340 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 69MPasourcetypical (single ASTM D638 tensile strength) | 1,035MPasourcetypical, transverse |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 69MPasourcetypical | 1,140MPasourcetypical, transverse |
| Compressive strength | 124MPasourcecompressive stress at 10% deformation | not sourced |
| Flexural strength | 99MPasourceflexural yield strength, typical | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 75%sourcetypical | 18%sourcetypical, transverse |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.8GPasourcetypical | 200GPasourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered) |
| Density | 1,420kg/m³sourcetypical (DuPont product information for Delrin 100 NC010; 'The data listed here fall within the normal range of product properties') | 7,840kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 48.6kN·m/kg | 132kN·m/kg2.72x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 1.97MN·m/kg | 25.5MN·m/kg12.9x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.35sourcetypical | 0.32sourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered) |
| Shear modulus | 1.04GPa | 75.7GPa73x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 3.11GPa | 185GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,404m/s | 5,049m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical | 37.5W/m·Ksourcetypical93.7x more heat through a fin |
| Thermal expansion | 122µm/m·Ksourcemean, 29 to 60 °C | 11.3µm/m·Ksourcemean, -18 to 93 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 610µm growth | 56.5µm growth10.8x less |
| Specific heat | 1,465J/kg·Ksourceaverage -18 to 100 °C, Delrin acetal resins (not grade-specific) | 448J/kg·Ksourcetypical |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 0.192mm²/s | 10.7mm²/s55.5x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 52.5W/m | 11,678W/m222x more resistant |
| Melting point | 175°Csourcecrystalline melting point | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 125°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa (annealed) | not sourced |
| Values for | DuPont Delrin 100 acetal homopolymer, Table 2 'Typical Properties of Delrin Acetal Resins' (ASTM methods), Delrin Design Guide Module III hosted on delrin.com | Carpenter (Latrobe) Lescalloy 4340 VAC-ARC datasheet; mechanical row for 1100 °F temper; physical properties grade-level |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Plastic POM/Acetal stronger than Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,035 MPa against 69 MPa for Plastic POM/Acetal (15x).
Which is lighter, Plastic POM/Acetal or Steel AISI 4340?
Plastic POM/Acetal is lighter: 1,420 kg/m³ against 7,840 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 4340.
Which is stiffer, Plastic POM/Acetal or Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 2.8 GPa for Plastic POM/Acetal, so the same part in Steel AISI 4340 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic POM/Acetal or Steel AISI 4340?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic POM/Acetal is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate; Steel AISI 4340 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam.
| Part that must be | Plastic POM/Acetal | Steel AISI 4340 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 12.9x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 1.53x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 33% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 2.72x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 10% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 43% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic POM/Acetal or Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 conducts heat better: 37.5 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for Plastic POM/Acetal.
Which expands less with temperature?
Steel AISI 4340 expands less: 11.3 µm/m·K against 122 µm/m·K for Plastic POM/Acetal.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Plastic PMMA
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Plastic Nylon
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Steel AISI 1045