Materials / Compare
Plastic Polypropylene vs. DMLS 316L Stainless Steel
Compare Plastic Polypropylene vs. DMLS 316L Stainless Steel strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 33MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527 | 530MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal |
| Ultimate tensile strength | not sourced | 640MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal |
| Elongation at break | not sourced | 40%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 1.45GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527 | 185GPasourcetypical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet) |
| Density | 900kg/m³sourcetypical, 23 °C ISO 1183-1 | 7,900kg/m³sourcepart density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine |
| Strength to weight | 36.7kN·m/kg | 67.1kN·m/kg1.83x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 1.61MN·m/kg | 23.4MN·m/kg14.5x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.42sourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) | 0.3sourcebase material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value |
| Shear modulus | 0.511GPa | 71.2GPa139x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 3.02GPa | 154GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,269m/s | 4,839m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.17–0.22W/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) | 16.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °C |
| Thermal expansion | 80–100µm/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) | 15.7µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 450µm growth | 78.6µm growth5.73x less |
| Specific heat | not sourced | 500J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | 4.1mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 28.6W/m | 2,067W/m72.3x more resistant |
| Max service temperature | 90°CsourceHDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealed | not sourced |
| Values for | LyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO values | EOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1 |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is Plastic Polypropylene stronger than DMLS 316L Stainless Steel?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 530 MPa against 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (16.1x).
Which is lighter, Plastic Polypropylene or DMLS 316L Stainless Steel?
Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, Plastic Polypropylene or DMLS 316L Stainless Steel?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 185 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in DMLS 316L Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic Polypropylene or DMLS 316L Stainless Steel?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Polypropylene is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate; DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie.
| Part that must be | Plastic Polypropylene | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 14.5x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 29% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1.74x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 1.83x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | lighter | 38% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 2.19x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic Polypropylene or DMLS 316L Stainless Steel?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 16.2 W/m·K against 0.195 W/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel expands less: 15.7 µm/m·K against 90 µm/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. Plastic ABS
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. SLS PA12 Nylon
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. Rubber
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel A992
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018