Materials / Compare
Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
Compare Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 45MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield 23 °C | 861MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | not sourced | 886MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) |
| Flexural strength | 65MPasourcetypical, 23 °C | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 10%sourcenominal strain at break, 23 °C | 19.9%sourcemean at break, as built, horizontal |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.3GPasourcetypical | 197GPasourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs) |
| Density | 1,040kg/m³sourcetypical | 7,790kg/m³sourcemean part density (ISO 3369) |
| Strength to weight | 43.3kN·m/kg | 110kN·m/kg2.55x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 2.21MN·m/kg | 25.3MN·m/kg11.4x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.39sourcetypical, ABS family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) | 0.272sourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs) |
| Shear modulus | 0.827GPa | 77.4GPa93.6x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 3.48GPa | 144GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,487m/s | 5,029m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.17W/m·Ksourcetypical | 17.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) |
| Thermal expansion | 80–110µm/m·Ksourcerange | 10.4µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published) |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 475µm growth | 52µm growth9.13x less |
| Specific heat | not sourced | 460J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | 5mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 21.4W/m | 5,474W/m256x more resistant |
| Max service temperature | 94°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa (annealed 4 h/80 °C) | not sourced |
| Values for | INEOS Styrolution Terluran GP-22 general-purpose injection-molding ABS, ISO typical values (TDS revision 08/01/2022) | EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8M |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) stronger than DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 861 MPa against 45 MPa for Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) (19.1x).
Which is lighter, Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?
Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) is lighter: 1,040 kg/m³ against 7,790 kg/m³ for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 2.3 GPa for Plastic ABS (bulk/injection), so the same part in DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate; DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie.
| Part that must be | Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 11.4x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 24% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1.7x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 2.55x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | lighter | 5% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 1.71x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for Plastic ABS (bulk/injection).
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel expands less: 10.4 µm/m·K against 95 µm/m·K for Plastic ABS (bulk/injection).
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) vs. FDM ASA
- Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) vs. Plastic ABS
- Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) vs. Plastic PETG
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 4340
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045