Materials / Compare

Plastic ABS vs. Plastic UHMWPE

Compare Plastic ABS vs. Plastic UHMWPE strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic ABS3D printed (FDM)
Plastic UHMWPEBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength38.1MPasourcetypical20MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Ultimate tensile strength38.1MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)43MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at break ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Flexural strength61.1MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break4.6%sourcetypical465%sourcetypical, nominal elongation at break ISO 527
Young's modulus (stiffness)1.96GPasourcetypical0.66GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527, 1 mm/min
Density1,100kg/m³sourcetypical930kg/m³sourcetypical18% lighter
Strength to weight34.6kN·m/kg1.61x higher21.5kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight1.78MN·m/kg2.51x higher0.71MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.39sourcebase material: ABS family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1)not sourced
Shear modulus0.706GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus2.97GPanot sourced
Speed of sound1,336m/s842m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Terluran GP-22 injection-molding ABS, typical0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, unfilled (narrative value, generic Celanese UHMWPE)
Thermal expansion80–110µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Terluran GP-22 injection-molding ABS, range200µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 to 100 °C (generic Celanese UHMWPE)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing475µm growth2.11x less1,000µm growth
Specific heatnot sourcednot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourcednot sourced
Thermal shock resistance21.2W/mnot sourced
Melting pointnot sourced130–138°CsourceDSC 10 K/min
Glass transition101°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Max service temperature86.6°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)80°Csourcerecommended max constant operating temperature
Values forUltimaker ABS, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v5.00, April 20, 2022.Celanese GUR 4120 (avg. molecular weight 4.7x10^6 g/mol), typical values on compression-molded specimens; CTE and thermal conductivity from Celanese's generic UHMWPE guide (grade not named)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic ABS is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Plastic ABS stronger than Plastic UHMWPE?

Plastic ABS is stronger: its yield strength is 38.1 MPa against 20 MPa for Plastic UHMWPE (1.91x).

Which is lighter, Plastic ABS or Plastic UHMWPE?

Plastic UHMWPE is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 1,100 kg/m³ for Plastic ABS.

Which is stiffer, Plastic ABS or Plastic UHMWPE?

Plastic ABS is stiffer: Young's modulus 1.96 GPa against 0.66 GPa for Plastic UHMWPE, so the same part in Plastic ABS deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic ABS or Plastic UHMWPE?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic ABS is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must bePlastic ABSPlastic UHMWPE
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter2.51x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter46% heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter22% heavier
Strong rod or tielighter1.61x heavier
Strong beamlighter30% heavier
Strong panel or platelighter17% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic ABS or Plastic UHMWPE?

Plastic UHMWPE conducts heat better: 0.4 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for Plastic ABS.

Which expands less with temperature?

Plastic ABS expands less: 95 µm/m·K against 200 µm/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic ABSPlastic UHMWPE
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic ABSPlastic UHMWPE
Strength against density

Related comparisons