Aluminum 5052-H32 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel

Compare Aluminum 5052-H32 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel3D printed metal (DMLS)

Mechanical
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser	Open in LessCAD	Open in LessCAD
Yield strength	195MPasourcetypical, 0.2% offset	861MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72)
Ultimate tensile strength	230MPasourcetypical	886MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72)
Elongation at break	12%sourcetypical	19.9%sourcemean at break, as built, horizontal
Young's modulus (stiffness)	70GPasourcetypical	197GPasourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs)
Density	2,685kg/m³sourcenominal	7,790kg/m³sourcemean part density (ISO 3369)
Strength to weight	72.6kN·m/kg	110kN·m/kg1.52x higher
Stiffness to weight	26.1MN·m/kg3% higher	25.3MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio	0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant)	0.272sourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs)
Shear modulus	26.3GPa	77.4GPa2.94x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus	68.6GPa	144GPa
Speed of sound	5,106m/s	5,029m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity	138W/m·Ksourcebase material: 5052 in O temper (same alloy, annealed); Kaiser typical	17.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs)
Thermal expansion	23.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C	10.4µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing	119µm growth	52µm growth2.29x less
Specific heat	963J/kg·Ksourceat 100 °C (212 °F); table covers O, H32, H34, H36, H38	460J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)	53.4mm²/s10.7x faster	5mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance	10,822W/m1.98x more resistant	5,474W/m
Melting point	605–650°Csourcemelting range	not sourced
Values for	5052-H32, Kaiser Aluminum tube & pipe typical datasheet (mechanical, CTE, melting); MIL-HDBK-5J (Poisson, density, specific heat)	EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8M

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Aluminum 5052-H32 stronger than DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 861 MPa against 195 MPa for Aluminum 5052-H32 (4.41x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum 5052-H32 or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?

Aluminum 5052-H32 is lighter: 2,685 kg/m³ against 7,790 kg/m³ for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum 5052-H32 or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 70 GPa for Aluminum 5052-H32, so the same part in DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 5052-H32 or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 5052-H32 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate; DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter for a strong rod or tie.

Part that must be	Aluminum 5052-H32	DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
Stiff rod or tie (tension)	lighter	3% heavier
Stiff beam (bending)	lighter	1.73x heavier
Stiff panel or plate	lighter	2.05x heavier
Strong rod or tie	1.52x heavier	lighter
Strong beam	lighter	8% heavier
Strong panel or plate	lighter	38% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 5052-H32 or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?

Aluminum 5052-H32 conducts heat better: 138 W/m·K against 17.9 W/m·K for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.

Which expands less with temperature?

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel expands less: 10.4 µm/m·K against 23.8 µm/m·K for Aluminum 5052-H32.

Among 59 materials

Stiffness against density

Strength against density