Materials / Compare

Aluminum 6061-T6 vs. FDM HIPS

Compare Aluminum 6061-T6 vs. FDM HIPS strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum 6061-T6Wrought
FDM HIPS3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength276MPasourcetypical, 0.2% offset, .500 in dia specimennot given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength310MPasourcetypical16.8x stronger18.4MPasourcetypical
Flexural strengthnot sourced31.8MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break17%sourcetypical, in 4D, 0.500 in dia specimen1.4%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)68.3GPasourcetypical43x stiffer1.59GPasourcetypical
Density2,700kg/m³sourcenominal1,023kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight102kN·m/kg5.68x higher18kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight25.3MN·m/kg16.3x higher1.55MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant)not sourced
Shear modulus25.7GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus67GPanot sourced
Speed of sound5,030m/s1,246m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity167W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution PS 486N injection-molding HIPS, typical
Thermal expansion23.6µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C80µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution PS 486N injection-molding HIPS, typical
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing118µm growth3.39x less400µm growth
Specific heat896J/kg·Ksourcetypical, at 100 °Cnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)69mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistance19,159W/mnot sourced
Melting point582–652°Csourcesolidus-liquidusnot sourced
Glass transitionnot sourced99°Csourcetypical
Max service temperaturenot sourced86°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa
Values for6061-T6/T651, Kaiser Aluminum typical properties; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5JBASF Forward AM (BASF 3D Printing Solutions) Ultrafuse HiPS, TDS v2.2 (13.11.2019), printed specimens, XY 'Flat'. Specimen print settings are not stated; recommended processing on the sheet: nozzle 240-260 °C, bed 100-120 °C, 40-80 mm/s. Product is discontinued (Forward AM product page) but the TDS is still served by Forward AM.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM HIPS is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Aluminum 6061-T6 stronger than FDM HIPS?

Aluminum 6061-T6 is stronger: its yield strength is 276 MPa against tensile strength 18.4 MPa for FDM HIPS (15x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum 6061-T6 or FDM HIPS?

FDM HIPS is lighter: 1,023 kg/m³ against 2,700 kg/m³ for Aluminum 6061-T6.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum 6061-T6 or FDM HIPS?

Aluminum 6061-T6 is stiffer: Young's modulus 68.3 GPa against 1.59 GPa for FDM HIPS, so the same part in Aluminum 6061-T6 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 6061-T6 or FDM HIPS?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 6061-T6 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum 6061-T6FDM HIPS
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter16.3x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter2.48x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter33% heavier
Strong rod or tielighter5.68x heavier
Strong beamlighter2.3x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter47% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 6061-T6 or FDM HIPS?

Aluminum 6061-T6 conducts heat better: 167 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for FDM HIPS.

Which expands less with temperature?

Aluminum 6061-T6 expands less: 23.6 µm/m·K against 80 µm/m·K for FDM HIPS.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelAluminum 6061-T6FDM HIPS
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickAluminum 6061-T6FDM HIPS
Strength against density

Related comparisons