Materials / Compare
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Nickel Inconel 718
Compare DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Nickel Inconel 718 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 270MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 450MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar |
| Elongation at break | 10.2%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal | 20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 72GPasourcesame material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY) | 200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged |
| Density | 2,670kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm) | 8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged |
| Strength to weight | 101kN·m/kg | 147kN·m/kg45% higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 27MN·m/kg11% higher | 24.3MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.33sourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000) | 0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged |
| Shear modulus | 27.1GPa | 77.3GPa2.86x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 70.6GPa | 162GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,193m/s | 4,932m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 110W/m·Ksourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2) | 11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a) |
| Thermal expansion | 20µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 | 13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 100µm growth | 66µm growth1.52x less |
| Specific heat | 963J/kg·Ksourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C | 435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 42.8mm²/s13.4x faster | 3.19mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 13,819W/m3.76x more resistant | 3,680W/m |
| Melting point | not sourced | 1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting range |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer |
| Values for | EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 | 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10 | INCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum stronger than Nickel Inconel 718?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 270 MPa for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum (4.47x).
Which is lighter, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Nickel Inconel 718?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter: 2,670 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which is stiffer, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Nickel Inconel 718?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 72 GPa for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Nickel Inconel 718?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a strong rod or tie.
| Part that must be | DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum | Nickel Inconel 718 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 11% heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 1.85x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 2.19x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 45% heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | lighter | 13% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 46% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Nickel Inconel 718?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 11.4 W/m·K for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which expands less with temperature?
Nickel Inconel 718 expands less: 13.2 µm/m·K against 20 µm/m·K for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 6061-T6
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 2024-T351
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Concrete
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 1045