Materials / Compare

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Iron

Compare DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Iron strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum3D printed metal (DMLS)
IronWrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength270MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal186MPasourcetypical (0.2% YS), hot rolled + SRA/recrystallization anneal
Ultimate tensile strength450MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal290MPasourcetypical, SRA/recrystallization anneal
Elongation at break10.2%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal38%sourcetypical, gauge 4D0
Young's modulus (stiffness)72GPasourcesame material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY)207GPasourcetypical, after SRA/recrystallization anneal
Density2,670kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm)7,860kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight101kN·m/kg4.27x higher23.7kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight27MN·m/kg2% higher26.3MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.33sourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000)0.282sourceNIST critically evaluated best value (polycrystalline iron)
Shear modulus27.1GPa80.7GPa2.98x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus70.6GPa158GPa
Speed of sound5,193m/s5,132m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity110W/m·Ksourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2)73.2W/m·Ksourcetypical at 20 °C
Thermal expansion20µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E22813.7µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20-399 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing100µm growth68.5µm growth46% less
Specific heat963J/kg·Ksourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C450J/kg·Ksourcetypical
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)42.8mm²/s2.07x faster20.7mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance13,819W/m4.01x more resistant3,447W/m
Melting pointnot sourced1,532°Csourcetypical
Values forEOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 | 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10Cleveland-Cliffs / AK Steel ARMCO Pure Iron Product Data Bulletin (07/2022): Table 1 typical physical properties, Table 2 typical mechanical properties after SRA/recrystallization anneal.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum stronger than Iron?

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stronger: its yield strength is 270 MPa against 186 MPa for Iron (45%).

Which is lighter, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Iron?

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter: 2,670 kg/m³ against 7,860 kg/m³ for Iron.

Which is stiffer, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Iron?

Iron is stiffer: Young's modulus 207 GPa against 72 GPa for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum, so the same part in Iron deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Iron?

For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumIron
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter2% heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter1.74x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter2.07x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter4.27x heavier
Strong beamlighter3.77x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter3.55x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Iron?

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 73.2 W/m·K for Iron.

Which expands less with temperature?

Iron expands less: 13.7 µm/m·K against 20 µm/m·K for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumIron
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumIron
Strength against density

Related comparisons