Materials / Compare

Iron vs. Steel AISI 1018

Compare Iron vs. Steel AISI 1018 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
IronWrought
Steel AISI 1018Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength186MPasourcetypical (0.2% YS), hot rolled + SRA/recrystallization anneal372MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Ultimate tensile strength290MPasourcetypical, SRA/recrystallization anneal441MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Elongation at break38%sourcetypical, gauge 4D015%sourcein 2 in (50.8 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)207GPasourcetypical, after SRA/recrystallization anneal200GPasourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Density7,860kg/m³sourcetypical7,861kg/m³sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Strength to weight23.7kN·m/kg47.3kN·m/kg2x higher
Stiffness to weight26.3MN·m/kg4% higher25.4MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.282sourceNIST critically evaluated best value (polycrystalline iron)0.32sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Shear modulus80.7GPa7% stiffer in shear75.7GPa
Bulk modulus158GPa185GPa
Speed of sound5,132m/s5,043m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity73.2W/m·Ksourcetypical at 20 °C51.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Thermal expansion13.7µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20-399 °C12µm/m·Ksourcebase material: unalloyed carbon steel, Ovako family table (S275JR, 'none alloyed structural steels', C <= 0.21%); mean 20-300 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing68.5µm growth60µm growth14% less
Specific heat450J/kg·Ksourcetypical486J/kg·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)20.7mm²/s1.52x faster13.6mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance3,447W/m5,473W/m1.59x more resistant
Melting point1,532°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Values forCleveland-Cliffs / AK Steel ARMCO Pure Iron Product Data Bulletin (07/2022): Table 1 typical physical properties, Table 2 typical mechanical properties after SRA/recrystallization anneal.AISI 1018 cold drawn bar (Niagara LaSalle, cold-finished bar producer)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Iron stronger than Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is stronger: its yield strength is 372 MPa against 186 MPa for Iron (2x).

Which is lighter, Iron or Steel AISI 1018?

Iron is lighter: 7,860 kg/m³ against 7,861 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 1018.

Which is stiffer, Iron or Steel AISI 1018?

Iron is stiffer: Young's modulus 207 GPa against 200 GPa for Steel AISI 1018, so the same part in Iron deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Iron or Steel AISI 1018?

For the same stiffness or strength: Iron is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate; Steel AISI 1018 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beIronSteel AISI 1018
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter4% heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter2% heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter1% heavier
Strong rod or tie2x heavierlighter
Strong beam1.59x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate41% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Iron or Steel AISI 1018?

Iron conducts heat better: 73.2 W/m·K against 51.9 W/m·K for Steel AISI 1018.

Which expands less with temperature?

Steel AISI 1018 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 13.7 µm/m·K for Iron.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelTitaniumStainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelIronSteel AISI 1018
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelTitaniumStainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickIronSteel AISI 1018
Strength against density

Related comparisons