Materials / Compare
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. FDM Polycarbonate
Compare DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. FDM Polycarbonate strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 270MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 53.3MPasourcetypical |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 450MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 53.3MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 89.4MPasourcetypical |
| Elongation at break | 10.2%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal | 9.2%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 72GPasourcesame material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY) | 2.39GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 2,670kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm) | 1,180–1,200kg/m³sourcerange |
| Strength to weight | 101kN·m/kg2.26x higher | 44.8kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 27MN·m/kg13.4x higher | 2.01MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.33sourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000) | 0.38sourcebase material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) |
| Shear modulus | 27.1GPa31.2x stiffer in shear | 0.867GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 70.6GPa | 3.33GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,193m/s | 1,418m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 110W/m·Ksourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2) | 0.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °C |
| Thermal expansion | 20µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 | 65µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 100µm growth3.25x less | 325µm growth |
| Specific heat | 963J/kg·Ksourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 42.8mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 13,819W/m325x more resistant | 42.5W/m |
| Glass transition | not sourced | 108°Csourcetypical |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 105°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) |
| Values for | EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 | 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10 | Ultimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum and FDM Polycarbonate are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum stronger than FDM Polycarbonate?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stronger: its yield strength is 270 MPa against 53.3 MPa for FDM Polycarbonate (5.07x).
Which is lighter, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or FDM Polycarbonate?
FDM Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,190 kg/m³ against 2,670 kg/m³ for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.
Which is stiffer, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or FDM Polycarbonate?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stiffer: Young's modulus 72 GPa against 2.39 GPa for FDM Polycarbonate, so the same part in DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or FDM Polycarbonate?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam.
| Part that must be | DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum | FDM Polycarbonate |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 13.4x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 2.44x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 39% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 2.26x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 31% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | about equal | about equal |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or FDM Polycarbonate?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum expands less: 20 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 6061-T6
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 2024-T351
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Concrete
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard