Materials / Compare

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Plastic PLA

Compare DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Plastic PLA strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum3D printed metal (DMLS)
Plastic PLA3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength270MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal52.5MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength450MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal52.5MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)
Flexural strengthnot sourced96.8MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break10.2%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal7.8%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)72GPasourcesame material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY)3.25GPasourcetypical
Density2,670kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm)1,240kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight101kN·m/kg2.39x higher42.3kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight27MN·m/kg10.3x higher2.62MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.33sourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000)not sourced
Shear modulus27.1GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus70.6GPanot sourced
Speed of sound5,193m/s1,619m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity110W/m·Ksourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2)0.13W/m·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C
Thermal expansion20µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228not sourced
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing100µm growthnot sourced
Specific heat963J/kg·Ksourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C1,200J/kg·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)42.8mm²/s490x faster0.0874mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance13,819W/mnot sourced
Melting pointnot sourced152°Csourcetypical
Glass transitionnot sourced59.1°Csourcetypical
Max service temperaturenot sourced58.8°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
Values forEOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 | 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10Ultimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum and Plastic PLA are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum stronger than Plastic PLA?

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stronger: its yield strength is 270 MPa against 52.5 MPa for Plastic PLA (5.14x).

Which is lighter, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic PLA?

Plastic PLA is lighter: 1,240 kg/m³ against 2,670 kg/m³ for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.

Which is stiffer, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic PLA?

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stiffer: Young's modulus 72 GPa against 3.25 GPa for Plastic PLA, so the same part in DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic PLA?

For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumPlastic PLA
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter10.3x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter2.19x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter30% heavier
Strong rod or tielighter2.39x heavier
Strong beamlighter38% heavier
Strong panel or platelighter5% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic PLA?

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumPlastic PLA
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumPlastic PLA
Strength against density

Related comparisons