Materials / Compare
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Plastic Polypropylene
Compare DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Plastic Polypropylene strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 270MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 33MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527 |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 450MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 10.2%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal | not sourced |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 72GPasourcesame material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY) | 1.45GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527 |
| Density | 2,670kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm) | 900kg/m³sourcetypical, 23 °C ISO 1183-1 |
| Strength to weight | 101kN·m/kg2.76x higher | 36.7kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 27MN·m/kg16.7x higher | 1.61MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.33sourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000) | 0.42sourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) |
| Shear modulus | 27.1GPa53x stiffer in shear | 0.511GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 70.6GPa | 3.02GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,193m/s | 1,269m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 110W/m·Ksourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2) | 0.17–0.22W/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) |
| Thermal expansion | 20µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 | 80–100µm/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 100µm growth4.5x less | 450µm growth |
| Specific heat | 963J/kg·Ksourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 42.8mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 13,819W/m483x more resistant | 28.6W/m |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 90°CsourceHDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealed |
| Values for | EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 | 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10 | LyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum stronger than Plastic Polypropylene?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stronger: its yield strength is 270 MPa against 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (8.18x).
Which is lighter, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic Polypropylene?
Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 2,670 kg/m³ for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.
Which is stiffer, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic Polypropylene?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stiffer: Young's modulus 72 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic Polypropylene?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam; Plastic Polypropylene is lighter for a strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum | Plastic Polypropylene |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 16.7x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 2.38x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 24% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 2.76x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 37% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | 4% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic Polypropylene?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 0.195 W/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum expands less: 20 µm/m·K against 90 µm/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 6061-T6
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 2024-T351
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Concrete
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. Plastic ABS
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. SLS PA12 Nylon
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. Rubber