Materials / Compare
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Steel AISI 4340
Compare DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Steel AISI 4340 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 270MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 1,035MPasourcetypical, transverse |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 450MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 1,140MPasourcetypical, transverse |
| Elongation at break | 10.2%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal | 18%sourcetypical, transverse |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 72GPasourcesame material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY) | 200GPasourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered) |
| Density | 2,670kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm) | 7,840kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 101kN·m/kg | 132kN·m/kg31% higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 27MN·m/kg6% higher | 25.5MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.33sourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000) | 0.32sourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered) |
| Shear modulus | 27.1GPa | 75.7GPa2.8x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 70.6GPa | 185GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,193m/s | 5,049m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 110W/m·Ksourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2) | 37.5W/m·Ksourcetypical |
| Thermal expansion | 20µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 | 11.3µm/m·Ksourcemean, -18 to 93 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 100µm growth | 56.5µm growth1.77x less |
| Specific heat | 963J/kg·Ksourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C | 448J/kg·Ksourcetypical |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 42.8mm²/s4.01x faster | 10.7mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 13,819W/m18% more resistant | 11,678W/m |
| Values for | EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 | 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10 | Carpenter (Latrobe) Lescalloy 4340 VAC-ARC datasheet; mechanical row for 1100 °F temper; physical properties grade-level |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum stronger than Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,035 MPa against 270 MPa for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum (3.83x).
Which is lighter, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Steel AISI 4340?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter: 2,670 kg/m³ against 7,840 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 4340.
Which is stiffer, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 72 GPa for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum, so the same part in Steel AISI 4340 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Steel AISI 4340?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Steel AISI 4340 is lighter for a strong rod or tie.
| Part that must be | DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum | Steel AISI 4340 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 6% heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 1.76x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 2.09x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 31% heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | lighter | 20% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 50% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Steel AISI 4340?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 37.5 W/m·K for Steel AISI 4340.
Which expands less with temperature?
Steel AISI 4340 expands less: 11.3 µm/m·K against 20 µm/m·K for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 6061-T6
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 2024-T351
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Concrete
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Steel AISI 1045