Materials / Compare

Aluminum 1100-O vs. FDM ASA

Compare Aluminum 1100-O vs. FDM ASA strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum 1100-OWrought
FDM ASA3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength35MPasourcetypical, O, 0.0625 in specimennot given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength90MPasourcetypical, O37MPasourcetypical
Flexural strengthnot sourced65MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break35%sourcetypical, O, in 4D9.2%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)69GPasourcetypical28.2x stiffer2.45GPasourcetypical
Density2,710kg/m³sourcenominal, 20 °C1,050kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight12.9kN·m/kg35.2kN·m/kg2.73x higher
Stiffness to weight25.5MN·m/kg10.9x higher2.33MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourcednot sourced
Shear modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Bulk modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Speed of sound5,046m/s1,528m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity222W/m·Ksourcetypical, O, 20 °C0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, typical
Thermal expansion23.6µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C80–110µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, range
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing118µm growth4.03x less475µm growth
Specific heat901J/kg·Ksourcebase material: commercially pure aluminium EN AW-1050A (Hydro), 20 °Cnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)90.9mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistancenot sourcednot sourced
Melting point640–655°Csourcemelting rangenot sourced
Max service temperaturenot sourced92°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa
Values for1100-O (annealed) commercially pure aluminium, Kaiser Aluminum Tube & Pipe Alloy 1100 Technical Data (Rev. 05/06), typical properties; specific heat from Hydro EN AW-1050A (99.5% Al) extruded-products datasheet (10/2018).Bambu Lab ASA, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y; nozzle 260 °C, bed 80 °C, 200 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM ASA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Aluminum 1100-O stronger than FDM ASA?

FDM ASA is stronger: its tensile strength is 37 MPa against yield strength 35 MPa for Aluminum 1100-O (6%).

Which is lighter, Aluminum 1100-O or FDM ASA?

FDM ASA is lighter: 1,050 kg/m³ against 2,710 kg/m³ for Aluminum 1100-O.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum 1100-O or FDM ASA?

Aluminum 1100-O is stiffer: Young's modulus 69 GPa against 2.45 GPa for FDM ASA, so the same part in Aluminum 1100-O deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 1100-O or FDM ASA?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 1100-O is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate; FDM ASA is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum 1100-OFDM ASA
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter10.9x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter2.06x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter18% heavier
Strong rod or tie2.73x heavierlighter
Strong beam2.68x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate2.65x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 1100-O or FDM ASA?

Aluminum 1100-O conducts heat better: 222 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for FDM ASA.

Which expands less with temperature?

Aluminum 1100-O expands less: 23.6 µm/m·K against 95 µm/m·K for FDM ASA.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum 1100-OFDM ASA
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum 1100-OFDM ASA
Strength against density

Related comparisons