Materials / Compare

Aluminum 1100-O vs. Plastic PLA

Compare Aluminum 1100-O vs. Plastic PLA strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum 1100-OWrought
Plastic PLA3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength35MPasourcetypical, O, 0.0625 in specimen52.5MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength90MPasourcetypical, O52.5MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)
Flexural strengthnot sourced96.8MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break35%sourcetypical, O, in 4D7.8%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)69GPasourcetypical21.2x stiffer3.25GPasourcetypical
Density2,710kg/m³sourcenominal, 20 °C1,240kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight12.9kN·m/kg42.3kN·m/kg3.28x higher
Stiffness to weight25.5MN·m/kg9.71x higher2.62MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourcednot sourced
Shear modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Bulk modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Speed of sound5,046m/s1,619m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity222W/m·Ksourcetypical, O, 20 °C0.13W/m·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C
Thermal expansion23.6µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °Cnot sourced
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing118µm growthnot sourced
Specific heat901J/kg·Ksourcebase material: commercially pure aluminium EN AW-1050A (Hydro), 20 °C1,200J/kg·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)90.9mm²/s1,041x faster0.0874mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourcednot sourced
Melting point640–655°Csourcemelting range152°Csourcetypical
Glass transitionnot sourced59.1°Csourcetypical
Max service temperaturenot sourced58.8°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
Values for1100-O (annealed) commercially pure aluminium, Kaiser Aluminum Tube & Pipe Alloy 1100 Technical Data (Rev. 05/06), typical properties; specific heat from Hydro EN AW-1050A (99.5% Al) extruded-products datasheet (10/2018).Ultimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic PLA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Aluminum 1100-O stronger than Plastic PLA?

Plastic PLA is stronger: its yield strength is 52.5 MPa against 35 MPa for Aluminum 1100-O (1.5x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum 1100-O or Plastic PLA?

Plastic PLA is lighter: 1,240 kg/m³ against 2,710 kg/m³ for Aluminum 1100-O.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum 1100-O or Plastic PLA?

Aluminum 1100-O is stiffer: Young's modulus 69 GPa against 3.25 GPa for Plastic PLA, so the same part in Aluminum 1100-O deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 1100-O or Plastic PLA?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 1100-O is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate; Plastic PLA is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum 1100-OPlastic PLA
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter9.71x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter2.11x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter27% heavier
Strong rod or tie3.28x heavierlighter
Strong beam2.86x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate2.68x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 1100-O or Plastic PLA?

Aluminum 1100-O conducts heat better: 222 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum 1100-OPlastic PLA
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum 1100-OPlastic PLA
Strength against density

Related comparisons