Thermal conductivity against densityHigher and further left: spreads more heat for its weightThermal expansion against thermal conductivityLower and further right: warps less when heated
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser
Sources4 documents: Kaiser Aluminum, Weir Minerals, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Defense Technical Information Center
Aluminum 3003-O
3003-O (annealed) aluminium-manganese alloy, the heat-exchanger tube and brazing alloy, Kaiser Aluminum Tube & Pipe Alloy 3003 Technical Data (Rev. 05/06), typical properties; specific heat from the NIST cryogenic 3003-F fit at 293 K.
Alloy 3003 Tube & Pipe Technical Data, Rev. 05/06Kaiser Aluminumarchived copyAluminum 3003-O · Yield strength: typical, O, 0.0625 in specimenAluminum 3003-O · Ultimate tensile strength: typical, OAluminum 3003-O · Elongation at break: typical, O, in 4DAluminum 3003-O · Young's modulus (stiffness): typicalAluminum 3003-O · Density: nominal, 20 °CAluminum 3003-O · Thermal conductivity: typical, O, 20 °CAluminum 3003-O · Thermal expansion: typical, mean 20-100 °CAluminum 3003-O · Melting point: melting range
2
Linatex Premium Rubber Spec Sheet (WMD0118, 2023)Weir MineralsRubber · Ultimate tensile strength: typicalRubber · Elongation at break: typicalRubber · Density: typical (specific gravity)Rubber · Max service temperature: continuous use operating range
3
Compressibility of Natural Rubber at Pressures Below 500 kg/cm², J. Res. NBS 68A (1964)National Institute of Standards and Technologyarchived copyRubber · Poisson's ratio: government (NBS J. Res. 68A, 1964): computed by NBS for peroxide-cured gum NR vulcanizate, 25 °C, infinitesimal deformation (0.49 in the solver: the linear element locks as the ratio nears 0.5 (nearly incompressible).)Rubber · Specific heat: government (NBS J. Res. 68A, Table 7; values observed for unvulcanized NR by Bekkedahl and Matheson), 25 °C
4
Thermal Conductivity of Soft Vulcanized Natural Rubber: Selected Values (AD 643325)Defense Technical Information Centerarchived copyRubber · Thermal conductivity: government selected value (US Army Natick Laboratories TR 66-49-PR, 1966), soft vulcanized natural rubber, 25 °C
Each number points to the document that states it, with the exact basis. Values without a number are computed from the sourced ones. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Mechanical
Is Aluminum 3003-O stronger than Rubber?
Aluminum 3003-O is stronger: its yield strength is 40 MPa against tensile strength 23 MPa for Rubber (1.74x).
Which is lighter, Aluminum 3003-O or Rubber?
Rubber is lighter: 960 kg/m³ against 2,730 kg/m³ for Aluminum 3003-O.
Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 3003-O or Rubber?
For the same stiffness or strength: Rubber is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
Part that must be
Aluminum 3003-O
Rubber
Strong rod or tie
1.64x heavier
lighter
Strong beam
1.97x heavier
lighter
Strong panel or plate
2.16x heavier
lighter
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, Aluminum 3003-O or Rubber?
Rubber stretches further before it breaks: 830% elongation at break against 30% for Aluminum 3003-O.
Thermal
Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 3003-O or Rubber?
Aluminum 3003-O conducts heat better: 193 W/m·K against 0.151 W/m·K for Rubber.