Materials / Compare

Aluminum 6063-T6 vs. Copper C110

Compare Aluminum 6063-T6 vs. Copper C110 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum 6063-T6Wrought
Copper C110Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength215MPasourcetypical, T6, 0.0625 in specimen69MPasourcetypical, 0.5% extension under load
Ultimate tensile strength240MPasourcetypical, T6221MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break12%sourcetypical, T6, in 4D55%sourcetypical, 1 in. rod
Young's modulus (stiffness)69GPasourcetypical117GPasourcetypical1.7x stiffer
Density2,700kg/m³sourcenominal, 20 °C8,913kg/m³sourcenominal
Strength to weight79.6kN·m/kg10.3x higher7.74kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight25.6MN·m/kg1.94x higher13.1MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourced0.34sourcereference value at room temperature (Wieland-K32 = Cu-ETP = C11000, rolled products)
Shear modulusnot sourced43.7GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced122GPa
Speed of sound5,055m/s3,626m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity201W/m·Ksourcetypical, T6, 20 °C391W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C
Thermal expansion23.4µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C16.9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C38% less
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing117µm growth84.5µm growth38% less
Specific heat901J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C (Hydro EN AW-6063)385J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)82.6mm²/s114mm²/s38% faster
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced8,992W/m
Melting point615–655°Csourcemelting range1,065–1,083°Csourcesolidus-liquidus
Values for6063-T6 extruded tube, Kaiser Aluminum Tube & Pipe Alloy 6063 Technical Data (Rev. 05/06), typical properties; specific heat from Hydro EN AW-6063 extruded-products datasheet (Rev.4, 03/2023).C11000 ETP copper, annealed to 0.050 mm grain size (OS050), 1 in. rod, copper.org typical values

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Aluminum 6063-T6 stronger than Copper C110?

Aluminum 6063-T6 is stronger: its yield strength is 215 MPa against 69 MPa for Copper C110 (3.12x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum 6063-T6 or Copper C110?

Aluminum 6063-T6 is lighter: 2,700 kg/m³ against 8,913 kg/m³ for Copper C110.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum 6063-T6 or Copper C110?

Copper C110 is stiffer: Young's modulus 117 GPa against 69 GPa for Aluminum 6063-T6, so the same part in Copper C110 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 6063-T6 or Copper C110?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 6063-T6 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum 6063-T6Copper C110
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter1.94x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter2.53x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter2.77x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter10.3x heavier
Strong beamlighter7.04x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter5.83x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 6063-T6 or Copper C110?

Copper C110 conducts heat better: 391 W/m·K against 201 W/m·K for Aluminum 6063-T6.

Which expands less with temperature?

Copper C110 expands less: 16.9 µm/m·K against 23.4 µm/m·K for Aluminum 6063-T6.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum 6063-T6Copper C110
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum 6063-T6Copper C110
Strength against density

Related comparisons