Materials / Compare

Aluminum A380 vs. FDM ASA

Compare Aluminum A380 vs. FDM ASA strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum A380Cast
FDM ASA3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength160MPasourcetypical, 25 °Cnot given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength320MPasourcetypical, 25 °C37MPasourcetypical
Flexural strengthnot sourced65MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break3.5%sourcetypical9.2%sourcetypical2.63x more ductile
Young's modulus (stiffness)71GPasourcetypical, 25 °C2.45GPasourcetypical
Density2,713kg/m³sourcetypical at 68 °F1,050kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight59kN·m/kg1.67x higher35.2kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight26.2MN·m/kg11.2x higher2.33MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourcednot sourced
Shear modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Bulk modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Speed of sound5,116m/s1,528m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity96.2W/m·Ksourcetypical at 68 °F0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, typical
Thermal expansion21.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 68-572 °F (20-300 °C)80–110µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, range
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing109µm growth4.36x less475µm growth
Specific heat963J/kg·Ksourcetypical at 68 °Fnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)36.8mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistancenot sourcednot sourced
Max service temperaturenot sourced92°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa
Values forA380 aluminium high-pressure die-casting alloy, typical properties; Rheocast Company (aluminium die caster, Germantown WI) A380 alloy data page.Bambu Lab ASA, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y; nozzle 260 °C, bed 80 °C, 200 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM ASA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Aluminum A380 stronger than FDM ASA?

Aluminum A380 is stronger: its yield strength is 160 MPa against tensile strength 37 MPa for FDM ASA (4.32x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum A380 or FDM ASA?

FDM ASA is lighter: 1,050 kg/m³ against 2,713 kg/m³ for Aluminum A380.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum A380 or FDM ASA?

Aluminum A380 is stiffer: Young's modulus 71 GPa against 2.45 GPa for FDM ASA, so the same part in Aluminum A380 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum A380 or FDM ASA?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum A380 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam; FDM ASA is lighter for a strong panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum A380FDM ASA
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter11.2x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter2.08x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter19% heavier
Strong rod or tielighter1.67x heavier
Strong beamlighter3% heavier
Strong panel or plate24% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which is more ductile, Aluminum A380 or FDM ASA?

FDM ASA stretches further before it breaks: 9.2% elongation at break against 3.5% for Aluminum A380.

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum A380 or FDM ASA?

Aluminum A380 conducts heat better: 96.2 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for FDM ASA.

Which expands less with temperature?

Aluminum A380 expands less: 21.8 µm/m·K against 95 µm/m·K for FDM ASA.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum A380FDM ASA
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum A380FDM ASA
Strength against density

Related comparisons