Materials / Compare

Aluminum A380 vs. FDM PAHT-CF

Compare Aluminum A380 vs. FDM PAHT-CF strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum A380Cast
FDM PAHT-CF3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength160MPasourcetypical, 25 °Cnot given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength320MPasourcetypical, 25 °C92MPasourcetypical
Flexural strengthnot sourced125MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break3.5%sourcetypical8.4%sourcetypical2.4x more ductile
Young's modulus (stiffness)71GPasourcetypical, 25 °C3.86GPasourcetypical
Density2,713kg/m³sourcetypical at 68 °F1,060kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight59kN·m/kg86.8kN·m/kg47% higher
Stiffness to weight26.2MN·m/kg7.19x higher3.64MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourcednot sourced
Shear modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Bulk modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Speed of sound5,116m/s1,908m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity96.2W/m·Ksourcetypical at 68 °Fnot sourced
Thermal expansion21.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 68-572 °F (20-300 °C)not sourced
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing109µm growthnot sourced
Specific heat963J/kg·Ksourcetypical at 68 °Fnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)36.8mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistancenot sourcednot sourced
Melting pointnot sourced225°Csourcetypical
Glass transitionnot sourced70°Csourcetypical
Max service temperaturenot sourced170°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa
Values forA380 aluminium high-pressure die-casting alloy, typical properties; Rheocast Company (aluminium die caster, Germantown WI) A380 alloy data page.Bambu Lab PAHT-CF, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y, dry state; nozzle 290 °C, bed 100 °C, 100 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM PAHT-CF is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Aluminum A380 stronger than FDM PAHT-CF?

Aluminum A380 is stronger: its yield strength is 160 MPa against tensile strength 92 MPa for FDM PAHT-CF (1.74x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum A380 or FDM PAHT-CF?

FDM PAHT-CF is lighter: 1,060 kg/m³ against 2,713 kg/m³ for Aluminum A380.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum A380 or FDM PAHT-CF?

Aluminum A380 is stiffer: Young's modulus 71 GPa against 3.86 GPa for FDM PAHT-CF, so the same part in Aluminum A380 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum A380 or FDM PAHT-CF?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum A380 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate; FDM PAHT-CF is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum A380FDM PAHT-CF
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter7.19x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter1.68x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter3% heavier
Strong rod or tie47% heavierlighter
Strong beam1.77x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate1.94x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which is more ductile, Aluminum A380 or FDM PAHT-CF?

FDM PAHT-CF stretches further before it breaks: 8.4% elongation at break against 3.5% for Aluminum A380.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum A380FDM PAHT-CF
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum A380FDM PAHT-CF
Strength against density

Related comparisons