Materials / Compare

Aluminum ADC12 vs. Solder SAC305

Compare Aluminum ADC12 vs. Solder SAC305 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum ADC12Cast
Solder SAC305Cast
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength149MPasourceone test result, 0.2% proof stress, as cast, ASTM tensile bar (Daiki)22MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength345MPasourceone test result, as cast, ASTM tensile bar (Daiki)39.6MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break2.3%sourceone test result, as cast, ASTM tensile bar (Daiki)49%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)79.8GPasourcestandard value (S.S.Aluminum)6.9GPasourcetypical, temperature and strain rate not stated
Density2,680kg/m³sourcemeasured (Daiki)7,350kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight55.6kN·m/kg18.6x higher2.99kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight29.8MN·m/kg31.7x higher0.939MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourced0.35sourcetypical
Shear modulusnot sourced2.56GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced7.67GPa
Speed of sound5,457m/s969m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity125W/m·Ksourcemeasured on specimens cut from a 50 x 100 x 5 mm flat die casting (Daiki)61W/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature not stated
Thermal expansion21µm/m·Ksourcemeasured, temperature range not stated (Daiki)21.9µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20-100 °C (MacDermid Alpha)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing105µm growth4% less110µm growth
Specific heat911J/kg·Ksourcemeasured (Daiki)232J/kg·Ksourcetypical (MacDermid Alpha)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)51.2mm²/s43% faster35.8mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced5,773W/m
Melting point515–582°Csourcesolidus-liquidus (Daiki)217–220°Csourcesolidus-liquidus
Values forJIS ADC12 (Al-Si-Cu, about A383 / EN AC-46100) high-pressure die-casting alloy, as cast; physical properties from Daiki Aluminium Industry (ADC12 ingot producer) measured values; modulus from S.S.Aluminum (ADC12 ingot producer) standard values.SAC305 (Sn96.5Ag3.0Cu0.5) solder alloy, bulk; Indium Corporation Indalloy 256 (SAC305) for Preforms product data sheet (Form No. 100346 R0, 2024), selected properties, test temperature not stated; expansion and specific heat from MacDermid Alpha VACULOY SAC TDS (06 September 2023).

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Aluminum ADC12 stronger than Solder SAC305?

Aluminum ADC12 is stronger: its yield strength is 149 MPa against 22 MPa for Solder SAC305 (6.77x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum ADC12 or Solder SAC305?

Aluminum ADC12 is lighter: 2,680 kg/m³ against 7,350 kg/m³ for Solder SAC305.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum ADC12 or Solder SAC305?

Aluminum ADC12 is stiffer: Young's modulus 79.8 GPa against 6.9 GPa for Solder SAC305, so the same part in Aluminum ADC12 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum ADC12 or Solder SAC305?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum ADC12 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum ADC12Solder SAC305
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter31.7x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter9.33x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter6.2x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter18.6x heavier
Strong beamlighter9.82x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter7.14x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum ADC12 or Solder SAC305?

Aluminum ADC12 conducts heat better: 125 W/m·K against 61 W/m·K for Solder SAC305.

Which expands less with temperature?

Aluminum ADC12 expands less: 21 µm/m·K against 21.9 µm/m·K for Solder SAC305.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OMagnesium AZ91DPlastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum ADC12Solder SAC305
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OMagnesium AZ91DPlastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum ADC12Solder SAC305
Strength against density

Related comparisons