Materials / Compare

FDM ASA vs. Stainless 316

Compare FDM ASA vs. Stainless 316 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM ASA3D printed (FDM)
Stainless 316Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)265MPasourcetypical (representative), annealed 1.0 mm sheet
Ultimate tensile strength37MPasourcetypical583MPasourcetypical (representative), annealed 1.0 mm sheet
Flexural strength65MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break9.2%sourcetypical61%sourcetypical (representative), annealed, in 2 in. (51 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)2.45GPasourcetypical200GPasourcetypical, in tension
Density1,050kg/m³sourcetypical7.64x lighter8,027kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight35.2kN·m/kg7% higher33kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight2.33MN·m/kg24.9MN·m/kg10.7x higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.3sourcedesign value (structural stainless steels)
Shear modulusnot sourced76.9GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced167GPa
Speed of sound1,528m/s4,992m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, typical14.6W/m·Ksource20–100 °C
Thermal expansion80–110µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, range16.5µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20–100 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing475µm growth82.5µm growth5.76x less
Specific heatnot sourced450J/kg·Ksourceat 20 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced4.04mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced821W/m
Melting pointnot sourced1,390–1,440°Csourcemelting range
Max service temperature92°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa871–899°Csourceoxidation (scaling) limit in air
Values forBambu Lab ASA, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y; nozzle 260 °C, bed 80 °C, 200 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.ATI 316 (UNS S31600), annealed 1.0 mm sheet, ATI technical data sheet (2012); Poisson's ratio from the Nickel Institute/SCI structural stainless design manual

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM ASA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM ASA stronger than Stainless 316?

Stainless 316 is stronger: its yield strength is 265 MPa against tensile strength 37 MPa for FDM ASA (7.16x).

Which is lighter, FDM ASA or Stainless 316?

FDM ASA is lighter: 1,050 kg/m³ against 8,027 kg/m³ for Stainless 316.

Which is stiffer, FDM ASA or Stainless 316?

Stainless 316 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 2.45 GPa for FDM ASA, so the same part in Stainless 316 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM ASA or Stainless 316?

For the same stiffness or strength: FDM ASA is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Stainless 316 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending).

Part that must beFDM ASAStainless 316
Stiff rod or tie (tension)10.7x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)18% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter1.76x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter7% heavier
Strong beamlighter2.06x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter2.86x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, FDM ASA or Stainless 316?

Stainless 316 conducts heat better: 14.6 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for FDM ASA.

Which expands less with temperature?

Stainless 316 expands less: 16.5 µm/m·K against 95 µm/m·K for FDM ASA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM ASAStainless 316
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM ASAStainless 316
Strength against density

Related comparisons