Materials / Compare

FDM ASA vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V

Compare FDM ASA vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM ASA3D printed (FDM)
Titanium Ti-6Al-4VWrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)885MPasourcetypical, plate (>0.187 in), annealed, 0.2% offset
Ultimate tensile strength37MPasourcetypical940MPasourcetypical, plate, annealed
Flexural strength65MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break9.2%sourcetypical16%sourcetypical, in 2 in., plate annealed
Young's modulus (stiffness)2.45GPasourcetypical107–122GPasourcetypical range, 20 °C
Density1,050kg/m³sourcetypical4,430kg/m³sourcenominal
Strength to weight35.2kN·m/kg200kN·m/kg5.67x higher
Stiffness to weight2.33MN·m/kg25.8MN·m/kg11.1x higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.342sourcemean of TIMET measurements
Shear modulusnot sourced42.7GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced121GPa
Speed of sound1,528m/s5,084m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, typical6.6W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C, mill annealed
Thermal expansion80–110µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, range9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 0-100 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing475µm growth45µm growth10.6x less
Specific heatnot sourced580J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced2.57mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced3,730W/m
Melting pointnot sourced1,630–1,650°Csourcemelting range
Max service temperature92°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa400°Csourceupper recommended use temperature
Values forBambu Lab ASA, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y; nozzle 260 °C, bed 80 °C, 200 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.TIMETAL 6-4 (Ti-6Al-4V Grade 5) annealed plate typical (TIMET properties manual) + TIMET datasheet TMC-0150 physical properties

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM ASA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM ASA stronger than Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?

Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is stronger: its yield strength is 885 MPa against tensile strength 37 MPa for FDM ASA (23.9x).

Which is lighter, FDM ASA or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?

FDM ASA is lighter: 1,050 kg/m³ against 4,430 kg/m³ for Titanium Ti-6Al-4V.

Which is stiffer, FDM ASA or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?

Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is stiffer: Young's modulus 115 GPa against 2.45 GPa for FDM ASA, so the same part in Titanium Ti-6Al-4V deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM ASA or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?

For the same stiffness or strength: FDM ASA is lighter for a stiff panel or plate; Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beFDM ASATitanium Ti-6Al-4V
Stiff rod or tie (tension)11.1x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)1.62x heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter17% heavier
Strong rod or tie5.67x heavierlighter
Strong beam1.97x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate16% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, FDM ASA or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?

Titanium Ti-6Al-4V conducts heat better: 6.6 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for FDM ASA.

Which expands less with temperature?

Titanium Ti-6Al-4V expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 95 µm/m·K for FDM ASA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Brass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM ASATitanium Ti-6Al-4V
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Brass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM ASATitanium Ti-6Al-4V
Strength against density

Related comparisons