Materials / Compare
FDM ASA vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
Compare FDM ASA vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | not given (tensile used) | 1,100MPasourcetypical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 37MPasourcetypical | 1,270MPasourcetypical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400) |
| Flexural strength | 65MPasourcetypical | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 9.2%sourcetypical | 8.7%sourcetypical at break, as built (M400) |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.45GPasourcetypical | 110GPasourcesame maker and process, sibling grade: EOS Titanium Ti64 (Grade 5) on EOS M 290, as built, XY and Z, typical |
| Density | 1,050kg/m³sourcetypical | 4,400kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), M400 |
| Strength to weight | 35.2kN·m/kg | 250kN·m/kg7.09x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 2.33MN·m/kg | 25MN·m/kg10.7x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | not sourced | 0.342sourcewrought TIMETAL 6-4 (TIMET measurement, mean of 10); composition-level, not DMLS-measured |
| Shear modulus | not sourced | 41GPa |
| Bulk modulus | not sourced | 116GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,528m/s | 5,000m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, typical | 6.6W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °C |
| Thermal expansion | 80–110µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, range | 9µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228; EOS Ti64 Grade 23 (=ELI) on EOS M 290 40 µm; condition not stated (sheet's mechanical data are heat treated) |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 475µm growth | 45µm growth10.6x less |
| Specific heat | not sourced | 580J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | 2.59mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | not sourced | 4,825W/m |
| Melting point | not sourced | 1,630–1,650°Csourcemelting range, wrought TIMETAL 6-4 (composition-level) |
| Max service temperature | 92°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa | not sourced |
| Values for | Bambu Lab ASA, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y; nozzle 260 °C, bed 80 °C, 200 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing. | EOS Titanium Ti64ELI (powder 9011-0040; ASTM F136/F3001, i.e. Grade 23) on EOS M400 SF, parameter set Ti64ELI_030_FlexM400_100, 30 µm, as built; ISO 6892-1 A14 |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
FDM ASA and DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is FDM ASA stronger than DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is stronger: its yield strength is 1,100 MPa against tensile strength 37 MPa for FDM ASA (29.7x).
Which is lighter, FDM ASA or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
FDM ASA is lighter: 1,050 kg/m³ against 4,400 kg/m³ for DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium.
Which is stiffer, FDM ASA or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is stiffer: Young's modulus 110 GPa against 2.45 GPa for FDM ASA, so the same part in DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, FDM ASA or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
For the same stiffness or strength: FDM ASA is lighter for a stiff panel or plate; DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | FDM ASA | DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 10.7x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 1.6x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 18% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 7.09x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 2.29x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 30% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, FDM ASA or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium conducts heat better: 6.6 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for FDM ASA.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 95 µm/m·K for FDM ASA.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- FDM ASA vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- FDM ASA vs. Plastic ABS
- FDM ASA vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- FDM ASA vs. Plastic PETG
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Titanium
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Steel AISI 4340