Materials / Compare

Brass C260 vs. FDM HIPS

Compare Brass C260 vs. FDM HIPS strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Brass C260Wrought
FDM HIPS3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength345MPasourcenominal, strip/flat, 0.5% extension (not 0.2% offset)not given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength427MPasourcenominal, strip/flat18.4MPasourcetypical
Flexural strengthnot sourced31.8MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break23%sourcenominal, in 2.0 in., strip/flat1.4%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)110GPasourcetypical, temper-independent1.59GPasourcetypical
Density8,525kg/m³sourcenominal1,023kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight40.5kN·m/kg2.25x higher18kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight12.9MN·m/kg8.34x higher1.55MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.34sourcereference value at room temperature (Wieland-M30 = CuZn30 = C26000, rolled products)not sourced
Shear modulus41.2GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus115GPanot sourced
Speed of sound3,597m/s1,246m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity121W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution PS 486N injection-molding HIPS, typical
Thermal expansion20µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-300 °C80µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution PS 486N injection-molding HIPS, typical
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing100µm growth4x less400µm growth
Specific heat377J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °Cnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)37.7mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistance12,510W/mnot sourced
Melting point916–954°Csourcesolidus-liquidusnot sourced
Glass transitionnot sourced99°Csourcetypical
Max service temperaturenot sourced86°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa
Values forC26000 cartridge brass, H02 half hard flat/strip: CDA Electronic Connector Design Guide (mechanical) + CDA alloy page (physical)BASF Forward AM (BASF 3D Printing Solutions) Ultrafuse HiPS, TDS v2.2 (13.11.2019), printed specimens, XY 'Flat'. Specimen print settings are not stated; recommended processing on the sheet: nozzle 240-260 °C, bed 100-120 °C, 40-80 mm/s. Product is discontinued (Forward AM product page) but the TDS is still served by Forward AM.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM HIPS is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Brass C260 stronger than FDM HIPS?

Brass C260 is stronger: its yield strength is 345 MPa against tensile strength 18.4 MPa for FDM HIPS (18.8x).

Which is lighter, Brass C260 or FDM HIPS?

FDM HIPS is lighter: 1,023 kg/m³ against 8,525 kg/m³ for Brass C260.

Which is stiffer, Brass C260 or FDM HIPS?

Brass C260 is stiffer: Young's modulus 110 GPa against 1.59 GPa for FDM HIPS, so the same part in Brass C260 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Brass C260 or FDM HIPS?

For the same stiffness or strength: Brass C260 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), strong rod or tie; FDM HIPS is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beBrass C260FDM HIPS
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter8.34x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)about equalabout equal
Stiff panel or plate2.03x heavierlighter
Strong rod or tielighter2.25x heavier
Strong beam18% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate1.92x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Brass C260 or FDM HIPS?

Brass C260 conducts heat better: 121 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for FDM HIPS.

Which expands less with temperature?

Brass C260 expands less: 20 µm/m·K against 80 µm/m·K for FDM HIPS.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VNickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrass C260FDM HIPS
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VNickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickBrass C260FDM HIPS
Strength against density

Related comparisons