Materials / Compare

Brass C360 vs. Plastic Polycarbonate

Compare Brass C360 vs. Plastic Polycarbonate strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Brass C360Wrought
Plastic PolycarbonateBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength310MPasourcetypical, 0.5% extension under load65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield
Ultimate tensile strength400MPasourcetypical65MPasourcetypical, stress at break
Flexural strengthnot sourced97MPasourcetypical, flexural strength
Elongation at break25%sourcetypical, 1 in. rod125%sourcetypical, strain at break
Young's modulus (stiffness)96.5GPasourcetypical, temper-independent2.4GPasourcetypical
Density8,498kg/m³sourcenominal1,200kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight36.5kN·m/kg54.2kN·m/kg48% higher
Stiffness to weight11.4MN·m/kg5.68x higher2MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.34sourcebase material: leaded free-machining brass CuZn39Pb2 (C37700), Wieland-Z30 rolled products, reference value at room temperature0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1)
Shear modulus36GPa41.4x stiffer in shear0.87GPa
Bulk modulus101GPa3.33GPa
Speed of sound3,370m/s1,414m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity116W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 C
Thermal expansion20.5µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-300 °C65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing103µm growth3.17x less325µm growth
Specific heat377J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)36.2mm²/s255x faster0.142mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance11,997W/m232x more resistant51.7W/m
Melting point888–899°Csourcesolidus-liquidusnot sourced
Glass transitionnot sourced144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/min
Max service temperaturenot sourced125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm
Values forC36000 free-cutting brass, H02 half-hard rod 1 in. section (20% cold work), copper.org typical valuesCovestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical values

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Brass C360 stronger than Plastic Polycarbonate?

Brass C360 is stronger: its yield strength is 310 MPa against 65 MPa for Plastic Polycarbonate (4.77x).

Which is lighter, Brass C360 or Plastic Polycarbonate?

Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,200 kg/m³ against 8,498 kg/m³ for Brass C360.

Which is stiffer, Brass C360 or Plastic Polycarbonate?

Brass C360 is stiffer: Young's modulus 96.5 GPa against 2.4 GPa for Plastic Polycarbonate, so the same part in Brass C360 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Brass C360 or Plastic Polycarbonate?

For the same stiffness or strength: Brass C360 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension); Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beBrass C360Plastic Polycarbonate
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter5.68x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)12% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate2.07x heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie48% heavierlighter
Strong beam2.5x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate3.24x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Brass C360 or Plastic Polycarbonate?

Brass C360 conducts heat better: 116 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.

Which expands less with temperature?

Brass C360 expands less: 20.5 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrass C360Plastic Polycarbonate
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickBrass C360Plastic Polycarbonate
Strength against density

Related comparisons