Materials / Compare

Brick vs. Plastic Nylon

Compare Brick vs. Plastic Nylon strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
BrickNatural
Plastic Nylon3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)63.1MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength5.1MPasourcemodulus of rupture (no direct tensile value)63.1MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)
Compressive strength77.9MPasourcemean unit compressive strength, solid extruded brick (survey mean; SD 30.8 MPa)not sourced
Flexural strengthnot sourced82.9MPasourcetypical
Elongation at breaknot sourcednot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)not sourced2.33GPasourcetypical
Density2,082kg/m³sourceface brick density row used for k (BIA notes most fired clay brick 120-130 lb/ft3)1,140kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight2.45kN·m/kg55.4kN·m/kg22.6x higher
Stiffness to weightnot sourced2.04MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourced0.4sourcebase material: unfilled polyamide (PA), conditioned, maker design-guide family value (Covestro Table 3-1)
Shear modulusnot sourced0.833GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced3.89GPa
Speed of soundnot sourced1,430m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.92–1.12W/m·Ksourcerange for 130 lb/ft3 face brick (ASHRAE 2013 via BIA)0.33W/m·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K) and PA6 (B3S), 23 C (same value for both)
Thermal expansion7.2µm/m·KsourceTMS Code average coefficient, clay/shale unit masonry98–102µm/m·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K, 98) and PA6 (B3S, 102), 23-55 C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing36µm growth13.9x less500µm growth
Specific heat837J/kg·Ksourcevalue used in BIA heat-capacity sample calculation1,700J/kg·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K) and PA6 (B3S), 23 C (same value for both)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.585mm²/s3.44x faster0.17mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced53.6W/m
Melting pointnot sourced188°Csourcetypical
Glass transitionnot sourced55.1°Csourcetypical
Max service temperaturenot sourced89.2°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
Values forSolid extruded clay/shale brick units (BIA 1993 manufacturer survey, TN 3A 2024); face brick of 130 lb/ft3 for thermal properties (BIA TN 4, from ASHRAE 2013); CTE is the TMS Code value for clay/shale masonryUltimaker Nylon, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat), conditioned >=24 h at room temperature; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v2.00, April 20, 2022.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic Nylon is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Brick stronger than Plastic Nylon?

Plastic Nylon is stronger: its yield strength is 63.1 MPa against tensile strength 5.1 MPa for Brick (12.4x).

Which is lighter, Brick or Plastic Nylon?

Plastic Nylon is lighter: 1,140 kg/m³ against 2,082 kg/m³ for Brick.

Which is lighter for the same job, Brick or Plastic Nylon?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Nylon is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beBrickPlastic Nylon
Strong rod or tie22.6x heavierlighter
Strong beam9.77x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate6.42x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Brick or Plastic Nylon?

Brick conducts heat better: 1.02 W/m·K against 0.33 W/m·K for Plastic Nylon.

Which expands less with temperature?

Brick expands less: 7.2 µm/m·K against 100 µm/m·K for Plastic Nylon.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic Nylon
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPURubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic Nylon
Strength against density

Related comparisons