Materials / Compare
Ceramic Aluminum Nitride vs. Plastic Nylon
Compare Ceramic Aluminum Nitride vs. Plastic Nylon strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | not sourced | 63.1MPasourcetypical |
| Ultimate tensile strength | not sourced | 63.1MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) |
| Flexural strength | 310MPasource3-point bending strength (JIS R 1601) | 82.9MPasourcetypical |
| Elongation at break | not sourced | not sourced |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 320GPasourcetypical (JIS R 1602) | 2.33GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 3,400kg/m³sourcetypical (JIS R 1634) | 1,140kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | not sourced | 55.4kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 94.1MN·m/kg46x higher | 2.04MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.24sourcetypical (JIS R 1602) | 0.4sourcebase material: unfilled polyamide (PA), conditioned, maker design-guide family value (Covestro Table 3-1) |
| Shear modulus | 129GPa155x stiffer in shear | 0.833GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 205GPa | 3.89GPa |
| Speed of sound | 9,701m/s | 1,430m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 150W/m·Ksourcetypical (JIS R 1611) | 0.33W/m·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K) and PA6 (B3S), 23 C (same value for both) |
| Thermal expansion | 4.6µm/m·Ksourcemean, 40-400 °C (JIS R 1618) | 98–102µm/m·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K, 98) and PA6 (B3S, 102), 23-55 C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 23µm growth21.7x less | 500µm growth |
| Specific heat | 710J/kg·Ksourcetypical (JIS R 1611) | 1,700J/kg·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K) and PA6 (B3S), 23 C (same value for both) |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 62.1mm²/s365x faster | 0.17mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | not sourced | 53.6W/m |
| Melting point | not sourced | 188°Csourcetypical |
| Glass transition | not sourced | 55.1°Csourcetypical |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 89.2°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) |
| Values for | KYOCERA AN216A dense sintered aluminium nitride, typical values; KYOCERA Fineceramics Europe data sheet 2023.04.03 | Ultimaker Nylon, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat), conditioned >=24 h at room temperature; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v2.00, April 20, 2022. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Plastic Nylon is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Which is lighter, Ceramic Aluminum Nitride or Plastic Nylon?
Plastic Nylon is lighter: 1,140 kg/m³ against 3,400 kg/m³ for Ceramic Aluminum Nitride.
Which is stiffer, Ceramic Aluminum Nitride or Plastic Nylon?
Ceramic Aluminum Nitride is stiffer: Young's modulus 320 GPa against 2.33 GPa for Plastic Nylon, so the same part in Ceramic Aluminum Nitride deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Ceramic Aluminum Nitride or Plastic Nylon?
For the same stiffness or strength: Ceramic Aluminum Nitride is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Ceramic Aluminum Nitride | Plastic Nylon |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 46x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 3.93x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1.73x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Ceramic Aluminum Nitride or Plastic Nylon?
Ceramic Aluminum Nitride conducts heat better: 150 W/m·K against 0.33 W/m·K for Plastic Nylon.
Which expands less with temperature?
Ceramic Aluminum Nitride expands less: 4.6 µm/m·K against 100 µm/m·K for Plastic Nylon.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- Ceramic Aluminum Nitride vs. Ceramic Alumina 96%
- Ceramic Aluminum Nitride vs. Concrete
- Ceramic Aluminum Nitride vs. Plastic PTFE
- Ceramic Aluminum Nitride vs. Brick
- Plastic Nylon vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- Plastic Nylon vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic Nylon vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic Nylon vs. Plastic POM/Acetal