Materials / Compare
FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
Compare FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 53.3MPasourcetypical | 63.1MPasourcetypical18% stronger |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 53.3MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) | 63.1MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)18% stronger |
| Flexural strength | 89.4MPasourcetypical | 82.9MPasourcetypical |
| Elongation at break | 9.2%sourcetypical | not sourced |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.39GPasourcetypical | 2.33GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 1,180–1,200kg/m³sourcerange | 1,140kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 44.8kN·m/kg | 55.4kN·m/kg24% higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 2.01MN·m/kg | 2.04MN·m/kg2% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.38sourcebase material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) | 0.4sourcebase material: unfilled polyamide (PA), conditioned, maker design-guide family value (Covestro Table 3-1) |
| Shear modulus | 0.867GPa4% stiffer in shear | 0.833GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 3.33GPa | 3.89GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,418m/s | 1,430m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °C | 0.33W/m·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K) and PA6 (B3S), 23 C (same value for both) |
| Thermal expansion | 65µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel | 98–102µm/m·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K, 98) and PA6 (B3S, 102), 23-55 C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 325µm growth1.54x less | 500µm growth |
| Specific heat | not sourced | 1,700J/kg·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K) and PA6 (B3S), 23 C (same value for both) |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | 0.17mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 42.5W/m | 53.6W/m26% more resistant |
| Melting point | not sourced | 188°Csourcetypical |
| Glass transition | 108°Csourcetypical | 55.1°Csourcetypical |
| Max service temperature | 105°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)17% hotter | 89.2°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) |
| Values for | Ultimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022. | Ultimaker Nylon, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat), conditioned >=24 h at room temperature; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v2.00, April 20, 2022. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
FDM Polycarbonate and Plastic Nylon are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is FDM Polycarbonate stronger than Plastic Nylon?
Plastic Nylon is stronger: its yield strength is 63.1 MPa against 53.3 MPa for FDM Polycarbonate (18%).
Which is lighter, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Nylon?
Plastic Nylon is lighter: 1,140 kg/m³ against 1,190 kg/m³ for FDM Polycarbonate.
Which is stiffer, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Nylon?
FDM Polycarbonate is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.39 GPa against 2.33 GPa for Plastic Nylon, so the same part in FDM Polycarbonate deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Nylon?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Nylon is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | FDM Polycarbonate | Plastic Nylon |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 2% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 3% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 3% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 24% heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 17% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 14% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which handles higher temperatures, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Nylon?
FDM Polycarbonate does: 105 °C against 89.2 °C for Plastic Nylon, both HDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens).
Which conducts heat better, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Nylon?
Plastic Nylon conducts heat better: 0.33 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.
Which expands less with temperature?
FDM Polycarbonate expands less: 65 µm/m·K against 100 µm/m·K for Plastic Nylon.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PETG
- Plastic Nylon vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- Plastic Nylon vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic Nylon vs. Plastic POM/Acetal
- Plastic Nylon vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)