Materials / Compare

Ceramic Aluminum Nitride vs. Plastic PEEK

Compare Ceramic Aluminum Nitride vs. Plastic PEEK strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Ceramic Aluminum NitrideSintered ceramic (pressed and fired)
Plastic PEEKBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot sourced98MPasourcetypical, tensile yield
Ultimate tensile strengthnot sourcednot sourced
Compressive strengthnot sourced125MPasourcetypical, 23 C
Flexural strength310MPasource3-point bending strength (JIS R 1601)165MPasourcetypical, flexural stress at yield, 23 C
Elongation at breaknot sourced25%sourcetypical, at break
Young's modulus (stiffness)320GPasourcetypical (JIS R 1602)4GPasourcetypical (nominal)
Density3,400kg/m³sourcetypical (JIS R 1634)1,300kg/m³sourcetypical (crystalline)
Strength to weightnot sourced75.4kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight94.1MN·m/kg30.6x higher3.08MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.24sourcetypical (JIS R 1602)0.38sourcetypical
Shear modulus129GPa89x stiffer in shear1.45GPa
Bulk modulus205GPa5.56GPa
Speed of sound9,701m/s1,754m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity150W/m·Ksourcetypical (JIS R 1611)0.29W/m·Ksourcetypical, average, 23 C
Thermal expansion4.6µm/m·Ksourcemean, 40-400 °C (JIS R 1618)55µm/m·Ksourceaverage of flow/cross-flow, below Tg (<143 C)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing23µm growth12x less275µm growth
Specific heat710J/kg·Ksourcetypical (JIS R 1611)2,200J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 23 °C, DSC (Victrex PEEK 450G TDS, revision Jul 2012)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)62.1mm²/s613x faster0.101mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced80.1W/m
Melting pointnot sourced343°Csourcetypical, DSC
Glass transitionnot sourced143°Csourceonset (midpoint 150 C)
Max service temperaturenot sourced240°CsourceUL 746B RTI, mechanical strength (continuous use index)
Values forKYOCERA AN216A dense sintered aluminium nitride, typical values; KYOCERA Fineceramics Europe data sheet 2023.04.03Victrex PEEK 450G (unreinforced, injection moulded), Victrex TDS rev. March 2026; Poisson from Victrex fluid-management flyer (2020-07)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Which is lighter, Ceramic Aluminum Nitride or Plastic PEEK?

Plastic PEEK is lighter: 1,300 kg/m³ against 3,400 kg/m³ for Ceramic Aluminum Nitride.

Which is stiffer, Ceramic Aluminum Nitride or Plastic PEEK?

Ceramic Aluminum Nitride is stiffer: Young's modulus 320 GPa against 4 GPa for Plastic PEEK, so the same part in Ceramic Aluminum Nitride deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Ceramic Aluminum Nitride or Plastic PEEK?

For the same stiffness or strength: Ceramic Aluminum Nitride is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate.

Part that must beCeramic Aluminum NitridePlastic PEEK
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter30.6x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter3.42x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter1.65x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Ceramic Aluminum Nitride or Plastic PEEK?

Ceramic Aluminum Nitride conducts heat better: 150 W/m·K against 0.29 W/m·K for Plastic PEEK.

Which expands less with temperature?

Ceramic Aluminum Nitride expands less: 4.6 µm/m·K against 55 µm/m·K for Plastic PEEK.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Ceramic Aluminum NitridePlastic PEEK
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Plastic PEEK
Strength against density

Related comparisons