Materials / Compare

Copper C110 vs. Plastic PBT GF30

Compare Copper C110 vs. Plastic PBT GF30 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Copper C110Wrought
Plastic PBT GF30Bulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength69MPasourcetypical, 0.5% extension under loadnot given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength221MPasourcetypical140MPasourcestress at break, 23 °C
Flexural strengthnot sourced210MPasourcetypical, 23 °C
Elongation at break55%sourcetypical, 1 in. rod3%sourcestrain at break, 23 °C
Young's modulus (stiffness)117GPasourcetypical9.8GPasourcetypical, 23 °C
Density8,913kg/m³sourcenominal1,530kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight7.74kN·m/kg91.5kN·m/kg11.8x higher
Stiffness to weight13.1MN·m/kg2.05x higher6.41MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.34sourcereference value at room temperature (Wieland-K32 = Cu-ETP = C11000, rolled products)not sourced
Shear modulus43.7GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus122GPanot sourced
Speed of sound3,626m/s2,531m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity391W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C0.27W/m·Ksourcetypical (DIN 52612-1)
Thermal expansion16.9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C25µm/m·Ksourcelongitudinal (flow), mean 23-55 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing84.5µm growth48% less125µm growth
Specific heat385J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C1,050J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 23 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)114mm²/s678x faster0.168mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance8,992W/mnot sourced
Melting point1,065–1,083°Csourcesolidus-liquidus223°CsourceDSC (ISO 11357)
Max service temperaturenot sourced205°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa
Values forC11000 ETP copper, annealed to 0.050 mm grain size (OS050), 1 in. rod, copper.org typical valuesBASF Ultradur B 4300 G6 (PBT, 30% glass fibre), injection moulding grade; product information sheet 09/2026, typical values for uncoloured product at 23 °C.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Copper C110 stronger than Plastic PBT GF30?

Plastic PBT GF30 is stronger: its tensile strength is 140 MPa against yield strength 69 MPa for Copper C110 (2.03x).

Which is lighter, Copper C110 or Plastic PBT GF30?

Plastic PBT GF30 is lighter: 1,530 kg/m³ against 8,913 kg/m³ for Copper C110.

Which is stiffer, Copper C110 or Plastic PBT GF30?

Copper C110 is stiffer: Young's modulus 117 GPa against 9.8 GPa for Plastic PBT GF30, so the same part in Copper C110 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Copper C110 or Plastic PBT GF30?

For the same stiffness or strength: Copper C110 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension); Plastic PBT GF30 is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beCopper C110Plastic PBT GF30
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter2.05x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)1.68x heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate2.55x heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie11.8x heavierlighter
Strong beam9.34x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate8.3x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Copper C110 or Plastic PBT GF30?

Copper C110 conducts heat better: 391 W/m·K against 0.27 W/m·K for Plastic PBT GF30.

Which expands less with temperature?

Copper C110 expands less: 16.9 µm/m·K against 25 µm/m·K for Plastic PBT GF30.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Copper C110Plastic PBT GF30
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Copper C110Plastic PBT GF30
Strength against density

Related comparisons