Materials / Compare
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. PCB Laminate FR-4
Compare DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. PCB Laminate FR-4 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 861MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) | not given (tensile used) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 886MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) | 246–385MPasourcetypical, in-plane: cross direction .. length direction (ASTM D3039) |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 531–621MPasourcetypical: cross direction .. length direction (IPC-TM-650 2.4.4B) |
| Elongation at break | 19.9%sourcemean at break, as built, horizontal | not sourced |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 197GPasourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 21.9–25.8GPasourcetypical, in-plane: cross direction .. length direction (ASTM D790-15e2) |
| Density | 7,790kg/m³sourcemean part density (ISO 3369) | 1,920kg/m³sourcetypical, 50% resin content; another FR-4 producer: Park Nelco N4000-6 (high-Tg multifunctional epoxy), not Isola 370HR |
| Strength to weight | 110kN·m/kg | 164kN·m/kg49% higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 25.3MN·m/kg2.03x higher | 12.4MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.272sourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 0.171–0.177sourcetypical, in-plane: cross direction .. length direction |
| Shear modulus | 77.4GPa7.62x stiffer in shear | 10.2GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 144GPa | 12.2GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,029m/s | 3,525m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 17.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical (ASTM E1952); direction not stated by the sheet |
| Thermal expansion | 10.4µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published) | 13–14µm/m·Ksourcetypical, in-plane X/Y-axis, below Tg (IPC-TM-650 2.4.24C) |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 52µm growth30% less | 67.5µm growth |
| Specific heat | 460J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 1,200–1,400J/kg·Ksourcetypical (ASTM E1461); another FR-4 producer: Park Nelco N4000-6 (high-Tg multifunctional epoxy), not Isola 370HR |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 5mm²/s31.2x faster | 0.16mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 5,474W/m16.9x more resistant | 324W/m |
| Glass transition | not sourced | 180°Csourcetypical, DSC (IPC-TM-650 2.4.25C) |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 130°CsourceUL Relative Thermal Index (UL 796) |
| Values for | EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8M | Isola 370HR FR-4 laminate (Polyclad PCL-FR-370HR, 180 C Tg multifunctional epoxy, E-glass fabric), copper removed; Isola data sheet Revision C, last updated April 15, 2021. Woven-glass laminate: the sheet gives in-plane values per weave direction (length / cross) and the Z-axis CTE separately; the solver is isotropic per material. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel stronger than PCB Laminate FR-4?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 861 MPa against tensile strength 315 MPa for PCB Laminate FR-4 (2.73x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or PCB Laminate FR-4?
PCB Laminate FR-4 is lighter: 1,920 kg/m³ against 7,790 kg/m³ for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or PCB Laminate FR-4?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 23.9 GPa for PCB Laminate FR-4, so the same part in DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or PCB Laminate FR-4?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension); PCB Laminate FR-4 is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel | PCB Laminate FR-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 2.03x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 41% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 2.01x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 49% heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 2.08x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 2.46x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or PCB Laminate FR-4?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for PCB Laminate FR-4.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel expands less: 10.4 µm/m·K against 13.5 µm/m·K for PCB Laminate FR-4.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 4340
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- PCB Laminate FR-4 vs. Concrete
- PCB Laminate FR-4 vs. Plastic PPS GF40
- PCB Laminate FR-4 vs. Magnesium AZ31B-H24
- PCB Laminate FR-4 vs. Magnesium AZ91D