Materials / Compare
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Nickel Inconel 718
Compare DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Nickel Inconel 718 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 861MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) | 1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 886MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) | 1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar |
| Elongation at break | 19.9%sourcemean at break, as built, horizontal | 20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 197GPasourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged |
| Density | 7,790kg/m³sourcemean part density (ISO 3369) | 8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged |
| Strength to weight | 110kN·m/kg | 147kN·m/kg33% higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 25.3MN·m/kg4% higher | 24.3MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.272sourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged |
| Shear modulus | 77.4GPa | 77.3GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 144GPa | 162GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,029m/s | 4,932m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 17.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a) |
| Thermal expansion | 10.4µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published) | 13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 52µm growth27% less | 66µm growth |
| Specific heat | 460J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 5mm²/s1.57x faster | 3.19mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 5,474W/m49% more resistant | 3,680W/m |
| Melting point | not sourced | 1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting range |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer |
| Values for | EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8M | INCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel stronger than Nickel Inconel 718?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 861 MPa for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel (40%).
Which is lighter, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Nickel Inconel 718?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter: 7,790 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Nickel Inconel 718?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 197 GPa for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Nickel Inconel 718?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate; Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel | Nickel Inconel 718 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 4% heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 5% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 5% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 33% heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 19% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 12% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Nickel Inconel 718?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 11.4 W/m·K for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel expands less: 10.4 µm/m·K against 13.2 µm/m·K for Nickel Inconel 718.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 4340
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. DMLS 316L Stainless Steel
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 1045
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 316L Stainless Steel