Materials / Compare
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Nickel Inconel 718
Compare DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Nickel Inconel 718 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 530MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 640MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar |
| Elongation at break | 40%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal | 20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 185GPasourcetypical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet) | 200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged |
| Density | 7,900kg/m³sourcepart density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine | 8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged |
| Strength to weight | 67.1kN·m/kg | 147kN·m/kg2.19x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 23.4MN·m/kg | 24.3MN·m/kg4% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.3sourcebase material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value | 0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged |
| Shear modulus | 71.2GPa | 77.3GPa9% stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 154GPa | 162GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,839m/s | 4,932m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 16.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °C | 11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a) |
| Thermal expansion | 15.7µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 | 13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 78.6µm growth | 66µm growth19% less |
| Specific heat | 500J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C | 435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 4.1mm²/s29% faster | 3.19mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 2,067W/m | 3,680W/m1.78x more resistant |
| Melting point | not sourced | 1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting range |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer |
| Values for | EOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1 | INCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stronger than Nickel Inconel 718?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 530 MPa for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel (2.28x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Nickel Inconel 718?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is lighter: 7,900 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Nickel Inconel 718?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 185 GPa for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Nickel Inconel 718?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff panel or plate; Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | Nickel Inconel 718 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 4% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | about equal | about equal |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 2.19x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 1.66x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 45% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Nickel Inconel 718?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 16.2 W/m·K against 11.4 W/m·K for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which expands less with temperature?
Nickel Inconel 718 expands less: 13.2 µm/m·K against 15.7 µm/m·K for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel A992
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 1045