Materials / Compare

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Plastic PLA

Compare DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Plastic PLA strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel3D printed metal (DMLS)
Plastic PLA3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength861MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72)52.5MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength886MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72)52.5MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)
Flexural strengthnot sourced96.8MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break19.9%sourcemean at break, as built, horizontal7.8%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)197GPasourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs)3.25GPasourcetypical
Density7,790kg/m³sourcemean part density (ISO 3369)1,240kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight110kN·m/kg2.61x higher42.3kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight25.3MN·m/kg9.65x higher2.62MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.272sourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs)not sourced
Shear modulus77.4GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus144GPanot sourced
Speed of sound5,029m/s1,619m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity17.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs)0.13W/m·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C
Thermal expansion10.4µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published)not sourced
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing52µm growthnot sourced
Specific heat460J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs)1,200J/kg·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)5mm²/s57.2x faster0.0874mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance5,474W/mnot sourced
Melting pointnot sourced152°Csourcetypical
Glass transitionnot sourced59.1°Csourcetypical
Max service temperaturenot sourced58.8°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
Values forEOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8MUltimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel and Plastic PLA are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel stronger than Plastic PLA?

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 861 MPa against 52.5 MPa for Plastic PLA (16.4x).

Which is lighter, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Plastic PLA?

Plastic PLA is lighter: 1,240 kg/m³ against 7,790 kg/m³ for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.

Which is stiffer, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Plastic PLA?

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 3.25 GPa for Plastic PLA, so the same part in DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Plastic PLA?

For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam; Plastic PLA is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PLA
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter9.65x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter24% heavier
Stiff panel or plate1.6x heavierlighter
Strong rod or tielighter2.61x heavier
Strong beamlighter3% heavier
Strong panel or plate1.55x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Plastic PLA?

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PLA
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelBrickDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PLA
Strength against density

Related comparisons