Materials / Compare

DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Rubber

Compare DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Rubber strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium3D printed metal (DMLS)
RubberBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength1,100MPasourcetypical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400)not given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength1,270MPasourcetypical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400)23MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break8.7%sourcetypical at break, as built (M400)830%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)110GPasourcesame maker and process, sibling grade: EOS Titanium Ti64 (Grade 5) on EOS M 290, as built, XY and Z, typicalnot sourced
Density4,400kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), M400960kg/m³sourcetypical (specific gravity)
Strength to weight250kN·m/kg10.4x higher24kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight25MN·m/kgnot sourced
Poisson's ratio0.342sourcewrought TIMETAL 6-4 (TIMET measurement, mean of 10); composition-level, not DMLS-measured0.5sourcegovernment (NBS J. Res. 68A, 1964): computed by NBS for peroxide-cured gum NR vulcanizate, 25 °C, infinitesimal deformation0.49 in the solver: the linear element locks as the ratio nears 0.5 (nearly incompressible).
Shear modulus41GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus116GPanot sourced
Speed of sound5,000m/snot sourced
Thermal
Thermal conductivity6.6W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °C0.151W/m·Ksourcegovernment selected value (US Army Natick Laboratories TR 66-49-PR, 1966), soft vulcanized natural rubber, 25 °C
Thermal expansion9µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228; EOS Ti64 Grade 23 (=ELI) on EOS M 290 40 µm; condition not stated (sheet's mechanical data are heat treated)not sourced
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing45µm growthnot sourced
Specific heat580J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °C1,881J/kg·Ksourcegovernment (NBS J. Res. 68A, Table 7; values observed for unvulcanized NR by Bekkedahl and Matheson), 25 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)2.59mm²/s30.9x faster0.0836mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance4,825W/mnot sourced
Melting point1,630–1,650°Csourcemelting range, wrought TIMETAL 6-4 (composition-level)not sourced
Max service temperaturenot sourced70°Csourcecontinuous use operating range
Values forEOS Titanium Ti64ELI (powder 9011-0040; ASTM F136/F3001, i.e. Grade 23) on EOS M400 SF, parameter set Ti64ELI_030_FlexM400_100, 30 µm, as built; ISO 6892-1 A14Weir Minerals Linatex Premium rubber (95 % natural rubber), typical physical properties, spec sheet WMD0118/202305

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium stronger than Rubber?

DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is stronger: its yield strength is 1,100 MPa against tensile strength 23 MPa for Rubber (47.8x).

Which is lighter, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Rubber?

Rubber is lighter: 960 kg/m³ against 4,400 kg/m³ for DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium.

Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Rubber?

For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumRubber
Strong rod or tielighter10.4x heavier
Strong beamlighter2.87x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter1.51x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Rubber?

DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium conducts heat better: 6.6 W/m·K against 0.151 W/m·K for Rubber.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumRubber
Strength against density

Related comparisons