Materials / Compare
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Stainless Steel 316
Compare DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Stainless Steel 316 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 1,100MPasourcetypical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400) | 265MPasourcetypical (representative), annealed 1.0 mm sheet |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 1,270MPasourcetypical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400) | 583MPasourcetypical (representative), annealed 1.0 mm sheet |
| Elongation at break | 8.7%sourcetypical at break, as built (M400) | 61%sourcetypical (representative), annealed, in 2 in. (51 mm) |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 110GPasourcesame maker and process, sibling grade: EOS Titanium Ti64 (Grade 5) on EOS M 290, as built, XY and Z, typical | 200GPasourcetypical, in tension |
| Density | 4,400kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), M400 | 8,027kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 250kN·m/kg7.57x higher | 33kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 25MN·m/kg | 24.9MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.342sourcewrought TIMETAL 6-4 (TIMET measurement, mean of 10); composition-level, not DMLS-measured | 0.3sourcedesign value (structural stainless steels) |
| Shear modulus | 41GPa | 76.9GPa1.88x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 116GPa | 167GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,000m/s | 4,992m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 6.6W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °C | 14.6W/m·Ksource20–100 °C |
| Thermal expansion | 9µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228; EOS Ti64 Grade 23 (=ELI) on EOS M 290 40 µm; condition not stated (sheet's mechanical data are heat treated) | 16.5µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20–100 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 45µm growth1.83x less | 82.5µm growth |
| Specific heat | 580J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °C | 450J/kg·Ksourceat 20 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 2.59mm²/s | 4.04mm²/s1.56x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 4,825W/m5.88x more resistant | 821W/m |
| Melting point | 1,630–1,650°Csourcemelting range, wrought TIMETAL 6-4 (composition-level) | 1,390–1,440°Csourcemelting range |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 871–899°Csourceoxidation (scaling) limit in air |
| Values for | EOS Titanium Ti64ELI (powder 9011-0040; ASTM F136/F3001, i.e. Grade 23) on EOS M400 SF, parameter set Ti64ELI_030_FlexM400_100, 30 µm, as built; ISO 6892-1 A14 | ATI 316 (UNS S31600), annealed 1.0 mm sheet, ATI technical data sheet (2012); Poisson's ratio from the Nickel Institute/SCI structural stainless design manual |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium stronger than Stainless Steel 316?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is stronger: its yield strength is 1,100 MPa against 265 MPa for Stainless Steel 316 (4.15x).
Which is lighter, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Stainless Steel 316?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is lighter: 4,400 kg/m³ against 8,027 kg/m³ for Stainless Steel 316.
Which is stiffer, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Stainless Steel 316?
Stainless Steel 316 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 110 GPa for DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium, so the same part in Stainless Steel 316 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Stainless Steel 316?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium | Stainless Steel 316 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | about equal | about equal |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 35% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 49% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 7.57x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 4.71x heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 3.72x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium or Stainless Steel 316?
Stainless Steel 316 conducts heat better: 14.6 W/m·K against 6.6 W/m·K for DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 16.5 µm/m·K for Stainless Steel 316.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Titanium
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Stainless Steel 316 vs. Stainless Steel 303
- Stainless Steel 316 vs. Stainless Steel 304
- Stainless Steel 316 vs. Steel AISI 1018
- Stainless Steel 316 vs. Iron