Materials / Compare
FDM PAHT-CF vs. Magnesium AZ31B-H24
Compare FDM PAHT-CF vs. Magnesium AZ31B-H24 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | not given (tensile used) | 220MPasourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm, 0.2 % proof stress |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 92MPasourcetypical | 290MPasourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm |
| Flexural strength | 125MPasourcetypical | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 8.4%sourcetypical | 13%sourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm, gauge 5.65√A |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 3.86GPasourcetypical | 44.8GPasourcetypical (handbook physical constant) |
| Density | 1,060kg/m³sourcetypical | 1,769kg/m³sourcenominal |
| Strength to weight | 86.8kN·m/kg | 124kN·m/kg43% higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 3.64MN·m/kg | 25.3MN·m/kg6.95x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | not sourced | 0.35sourcetypical (handbook physical constant) |
| Shear modulus | not sourced | 16.6GPa |
| Bulk modulus | not sourced | 49.8GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,908m/s | 5,032m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | not sourced | 76.9W/m·Ksourcetypical (temper/temperature not stated) |
| Thermal expansion | not sourced | 26.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical (temperature range not stated) |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | not sourced | 134µm growth |
| Specific heat | not sourced | 1,040J/kg·Ksourcetypical |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | 41.8mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | not sourced | 9,159W/m |
| Melting point | 225°Csourcetypical | not sourced |
| Glass transition | 70°Csourcetypical | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 170°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa | 149°Csourcestated application limit |
| Values for | Bambu Lab PAHT-CF, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y, dry state; nozzle 290 °C, bed 100 °C, 100 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing. | AZ31B-H24 sheet 0.016-0.062 in., MIL-HDBK-5J Table 4.2.1.0(b) (AMS 4377); strengths are S-basis MINIMUMS |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
FDM PAHT-CF is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is FDM PAHT-CF stronger than Magnesium AZ31B-H24?
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is stronger: its yield strength is 220 MPa against tensile strength 92 MPa for FDM PAHT-CF (2.39x).
Which is lighter, FDM PAHT-CF or Magnesium AZ31B-H24?
FDM PAHT-CF is lighter: 1,060 kg/m³ against 1,769 kg/m³ for Magnesium AZ31B-H24.
Which is stiffer, FDM PAHT-CF or Magnesium AZ31B-H24?
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is stiffer: Young's modulus 44.8 GPa against 3.86 GPa for FDM PAHT-CF, so the same part in Magnesium AZ31B-H24 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, FDM PAHT-CF or Magnesium AZ31B-H24?
For the same stiffness or strength: FDM PAHT-CF is lighter for a strong panel or plate; Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam.
| Part that must be | FDM PAHT-CF | Magnesium AZ31B-H24 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 6.95x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 2.04x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 36% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 43% heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 7% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 8% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).